Re: $200 Billion???
- From: Carl Lundstedt <clundst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:35:14 -0500
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:30:37 -0400, Randolph M. Jones wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>> "Randolph M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:432AC894.1010904@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>Jon Enslin wrote:
>>>
>>>>And yet no one wants to talk about how we are going to pay for it.
>>>>
>>>>Complete irresponsibility not only from the politicians on both sides
>>>>of the aisle, but also from the American People who want everything
>>>>that government can do without the willingness to pay for it.
>>>
>>>Just keep telling yourself that Kerry would have been worse.
>>
>>
>> I don't see how, but you might as well keep telling yourself
>> that.
>>
>>
>
> During the election, it appeared that many conservatives were deriding
> those non-conservatives who seemed more like they were voting "against
> Bush" than they were "for Kerry". But nowadays it's my impression that
> I'm seeing the "Kerry would have been even worse" excuse with increasing
> frequency.
I said it in the voting booth. I probably would have voted for a
reasonable, articulate demoncrat that told me their plan over Bush.
Carl Lundstedt
UNL
.
- References:
- Re: $200 Billion???
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- Re: $200 Billion???
- From: Michael
- Re: $200 Billion???
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- Re: $200 Billion???
- Prev by Date: Re: Croyle and Bower fire shots
- Next by Date: Re: No surprise from the Ninth Circus
- Previous by thread: Re: $200 Billion???
- Next by thread: Re: $200 Billion???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|