Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- From: "Edward M. Kennedy" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:06:01 -0400
"Jeff Davis" <jd_home@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:c72a7$4315e20d$80a32844$2041@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> This kind of thinking is pretty insane. Not to mention historically
> illiterate. Floods have destroyed New Orleans many times. In 1844, 1850,
> 1858, 1862, 1865, 1867, 1874, and 1882, the levees broke and inundated
> the place. The 1927 flood covered 25000 sq miles. (For comparison --
> that's about the size of West Virginia, half the size of Iowa, and 3
> times the size of New Jersy.
>
> There's going to be a port at the mouth of the Mississippi River. The
> country needs one. Currently, the best place for that is New Orleans. If
> you've got more adult wisdom on the question, be sure to let people in
> responsible positions know.
Google Earth revealed to my inner child that there
is above sea level and available real estate a few
miles upstream. It already has some port facilities
too. Yeah it's vulnerable to flooding like any port,
but it's not a below sea level bowl waiting for a
clusterfsck like today.
And lets just ignore the benefits to the delta and
the protection that could provide.
--Tedward
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- References:
- Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- Next by Date: Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- Next by thread: Re: OT New Orleans worth rebuilding?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|