Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Trent Woodruff)
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:22:34 GMT
><aborgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>>Trent Woodruff <woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>><aborgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>>>>Bryan S. Slick <onyx_hokie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> [ aborgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>>The point that you're missing is that Beauchamps "hundreds" is just as much
>>>>>"partisan fuckery" as Brettas "thousands" - you just happen to feel better
>>>>>about the former than the latter.
>>>> Wrong.
>>>> How many hundreds is 1,850? 18.
>>>> How many thousands? 1.85?
>>>> Get serious.
>>>They are both completely correct - 1850 is thousands as well as hundreds.
>>>Neither is more correct than the other.
>> I happen to think this is a stupid argument. However, how is 1850
>> "more than one set of thousand"?
>Integer multiples aren't the only multiples that exist my friend.
While I recognize the literal truth of your statement, I'm afraid I
find this a ludicrous argument.
Trent
Chairborne "Nine of Diamonds" Ranger
....To be a great NCO, you need three bones: a backbone, a wishbone and a funny bone.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: aborgman
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- References:
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: deemsbill
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Dan Bretta
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Bryan S . Slick
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Dan Bretta
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: deemsbill
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Bryan S . Slick
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: aborgman
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Bryan S . Slick
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: aborgman
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: Trent Woodruff
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- From: aborgman
- Re: Sgt Slick.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Cindy Sheehan, rational person
- Next by Date: Nice Tits!
- Previous by thread: Re: Sgt Slick.....
- Next by thread: Re: Sgt Slick.....
- Index(es):
Loading