Re: why is frist supporting stem cell research now?

mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Charles Beauchamp wrote:
>> mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Charles Beauchamp wrote:
>>>> mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> Charles Beauchamp wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Backpeddling from a non-bet? You are really an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever you call it. Fine, if you want to say you are
>>>>> backpedaling from a prediction that you made that I predicted
>>>>> would be incorrect, I guess that would do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um I am not backpeddling at all. You are getting stupider and
>>>> stupider and you started out kinda sorta okay least in this thread.
>>>
>>>
>>> ?? Ok, I'll rephrase the question one last time? Are you standing
>>> by your assertion that their would be comprehensive SS
>>> reform(including significant privatization) before the 08 elections?
>>>
>>
>> I am not even sure if I have actually said that. I do think there
>> will be some reform coming before the current President leaves
>> office. I do think one way or the other there will be some even
>> minor levels of individual accounts and he will declare victory no
>> matter how limited that may actually be. I would sure like an
>> actual quote of me making 1. a bet, 2. such an assertion or whatever
>> it is you think I think on whatever. I do think what you are out to
>> lunch and have no rational perspective as you demonstrate constantly
>> on these political matters. You remind me of a high school kid
>> frankly.
>>
>>> If you need want to look at your postings on this matter to help you
>>> make your decision I'll track them down.
>>>
>>
>> That should be a lot of fun to read. Especially as I have no clue
>> what you are talking about.
>
>> From a June posting(my post first, yours below):
>
>>> We'll see. That's all I have to say about it. It's already mid
>>> 2005 and congress has no plans to take this up anytime soon. They
>>> are too busy fiddling around with judges and mugging for the camera
>>> in preparation for future elections. No way will this issue get
>>> touched in the buildup to the 2006 elections. If by the end of
>>> President Bush's term we see national personal investment accounts
>>> I'll be shocked.
>
>
>
>> I will be here to laugh at you in a couple of years junior.
>
> I predicted that the issue would not get achieved(in the form of
> personal accounts) either before 06 or W leaves office. You, be
> saying you will be "here to laugh" at me in a couple of years make the
> opposite prediction. What isn't clear about that?
>

What is clear is that I did not make a bet and um..I have nothing to
backpeddle from. I have stated my case above and it looks pretty much spot
on target with what I apparently said in June.


--


v/r Beau



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Support Chee Siok Chin Legal Defence Fund
    ... I have already successfully transferred some money to her POSB accounts ... The PAP has been the ruling party in Singpaore for more than 40 years ... and hs won more than a dozen elections, ... This fight should be the fight of all Singaporeans who are concerned ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: Users missing Exchange mailbox still there
    ... the server generally doesn't wake up bored ... one morning and decide to delete accounts for a laugh. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: I want these two topics removed
    ... which accounts for the superficial resemblance. ... as I recall). ... Was he one of the 'point and laugh' ones? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: I want these two topics removed
    ... which accounts for the superficial resemblance. ... as I recall). ... Was he one of the 'point and laugh' ones? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • To my rmb friends
    ... Due to all the tensions of the elections and our faltering economy, ... believe we all need a good laugh. ... Here's my gift to you all: ...
    (rec.music.beatles)