Re: another liar and a cheat caught

[Trent Woodruff woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
[Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:14:35 GMT]

:>Bryan S. Slick was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
:>>[Trent Woodruff woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
:>>>Bryan S. Slick was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
:>>>>[Trent Woodruff woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
:
:>>>>And yet, it never slows you down. <smile>
:
:>>>Nice snip job, Trent.
:
:>>Snip job? What the ***? Bryan...EVERY SINGLE LETTER of your
:>>response was included in my reply to you. I didn't snip a single damn
:>>thing from your response.
:>>Damn, at least try not to be a cowardly liar ok?
:
:>My response to you:
:>"*** off, Trent.
:>If you think I'm not aware of the fact that my opinion is colored on
:>this by the fact that Palmeiro is an Oriole (to say nothing of the fact
:>that he's one of my favorite players), you're an idiot.
:>Having said that, I recognize that he's very likely actually guilty of
:>what he's accused of.. while at the same time being already tired of the
:>witch-hunt mentality running through Major League Baseball and the
:>"fans" of same.
:>Is Palmeiro getting the short end of the stick? Probably not. Is some
:>player going to get undeservedly fucked over eventually with the policy
:>and testing as it is right now? It's a matter of time, in my opinion,
:>if it hasn't already happened."
:>Your reply to the above:
:>">*** off, Trent.
:>I'm just saying...it was like the sun coming up in the east.
:>>If you think I'm not aware of the fact that my opinion is colored on
:>>this by the fact that Palmeiro is an Oriole (to say nothing of the fact
:>>that he's one of my favorite players), you're an idiot.
:>And yet, it never slows you down. <smile>"
:
:>Care to repeat your assertion that you didn't snip out anything..?
:>Say.. the last two paragraphs or so, in which I specifically stated that
:>Palmeiro's "very likely actually guilty", and that he's "probably not"
:>getting the short end of the stick?
:>You snipped those out (probably, anyway) because they would shoot down
:>your usual "homer" jab.
:
:So what you're trying to tell me is that I shouldn't have snipped that
:portion of your response that was totally irrelevant to my reply
:(irrelevant because you admitted to knowing your bias). Big fucking
:whoopty-doo.
:
:
:(Oh, but I included everything here for you...just in case you can't
:remember what the *** you typed.)

Wow.. never thought I'd see someone who loves to throw out the
"dishonest coward" behaving like one so blatantly.

YOU are the one who wrote, "Snip job? What the ***? Bryan...EVERY
SINGLE LETTER of your response was included in my reply to you. I
didn't snip a single damn thing from your response. Damn, at least try
not to be a cowardly liar ok?" That's the dishonesty.

The cowardice? The spinelessness in denying that the above was wrong,
instead making a lameass attempt to justify it. You very specifically
wrote "EVERY SINGLE LETTER", which was absolute horse***.. and then you
had the nerve to insult me while lying.

The reason the snip is relevant is that you only included what portions
of my post that would back up your usual half-witted "homer" charge that
you love to sling my way. What you snipped would have shot that all to
***, and so you disincluded it, and then had the brass balls (who'd you
steal them from?) to deny having snipped anything. You are being an
intellectually dishonest fuckwit, which again is ironic as all Hell,
given how much you LOOOOOVE to throw that particular ball of *** at
others on RSFC.


--
Bryan S. Slick, onyx_hokie at yahoo dot com

"To those who have fought for it,
freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
.

Loading