Re: Nationals Observers...

On Apr 6, 6:25 pm, scoop <bali_ultim...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Toad: I didn't make an argument. As far as what i think -- anything
more than two observers, for any game of ultimate, no matter the
stakes, would be overkill.


well i'm sure i'm not the only one that disagrees withyou on
that.....especially sinse they are RESPONSIBLE for ALL line calls.
Sorry but nobody is fast enough to cover all that ground.



I made no assertions one way or another
about how much is being spent now, or might be spent in the future, on
observers.



i guess i just interpreted that implification.



I do assert that it's idiotic to have 4 or 6 observers
involved.



so everyones an idiot but you eh?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
    ... The ball, from virtually one point in space. ... and a matter filled universe pulling in all directions. ... According to Mach, matter *makes* inertia. ... Multiple EM observers *within* the ball see the same image ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Constants
    ... matter, and I hope you will help me. ... The biggest question is ... ... How could lightspeed ignore the relative speed of observers? ... Nothing else in the universe can do such, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
    ... which, as with ECB, allows observers to distinguish repeated messages. ... (This may not matter for some ...
    (sci.crypt)