Re: Is allowing a team to score bad spirited ?

On Mar 31, 2:35 pm, ulticritic <t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:23 pm, Feetch <sglau...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 31, 2:12 pm, discimu...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:.

Obviously, this falls under the umbrella of "win at all cost"
strategies.

Bad spirit.

Seriously? Win at all cost has nothing to do with this. I go one
further to propose a hypothetical situation where you as a team are
continuing to try in a meaningless hard-cap, and there is a
catastrophic injury to either your team or the other team. Thats
stupid to risk.

I'm not even nutso like ulticritic and I think that this is taking
spirit too far. I will reiterate. Good strategy and time management
are never bad spirit.

Its perfectly acceptable to call a timeout when your team is winning
in a close game when you know the cap is coming. It is also
acceptable to just dump and swing for as long as you can until the cap
goes. These are the consequences in playing a sport where we play to
a point and not to a time, and we do not have stoppage time or
anything.

I THINK THAT DUDE WAS BEING SARCASTIC

i don't.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is allowing a team to score bad spirited ?
    ...  Win at all cost has nothing to do with this. ... further to propose a hypothetical situation where you as a team are ... are never bad spirit. ... in a close game when you know the cap is coming. ...
    (rec.sport.disc)
  • Re: Time outs in time cap situations
    ... our arch-rivals Overlake. ... We knew that meant that the time cap would be going ... "Spirit" again. ...
    (rec.sport.disc)
  • Re: Is allowing a team to score bad spirited ?
    ... Bad spirit. ... Win at all cost has nothing to do with this. ... Good strategy and time management ... in a close game when you know the cap is coming. ...
    (rec.sport.disc)