Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- From: "Frank Huguenard" <fhuguenard(no_spam)@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:12:56 GMT
Care to summarize? You seem to ask each candidate separate questions.
1) Referees: if you read the UPA guideline for Board members, it states that
they are under sworn oath to uphold Spirit of the Game.
Therefore, the UPA's bylaws would need to be rewritten for anyone to answer
this question honestly. Candidates can chime in their opinion all they want
but unless they commit to rewriting the constitution of the UPA, it doesn't
matter.
I can say that from my own experience playing with referees, it is very
liberating. However, I'd also add that the rules that I was playing by with
the referees made a lot more sense than anything the UPA has put out.
"ulticritic" <tsl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1192140178.142717.173350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 11, 4:25 pm, "Frank Huguenard"
<fhuguenard(no_spam)@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
No joke.
http://www.dischoops.com/upaboard.htm
Pass it along
well then, answer all the questions put forth on the "who wants my/
your vote" thread.......if you want my measly vote that is.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- From: ulticritic
- Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- References:
- Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- From: Frank Huguenard
- Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- From: ulticritic
- Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- Prev by Date: Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- Next by Date: Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- Previous by thread: Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- Next by thread: Re: Announcing my candidacy for the UPA Board of Directors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
