Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Allen Clement <aclement@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:48:51 -0600
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, eric.brach@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Regardless, making 2 regions out of the 3 existing ones in the
atlantic, and giving the UPA the right to offer two at-large bids, is
not such a bad idea.
.... for now. When the teams in the ME do finally start to dominate the sport (stop laughing, i realize it's far fetched, but it could happen) and the west coast teams become much weaker then all the whining and moaning will start up again with even more reason. Not only will the best teams all be in one region, but that region will have more teams than the other regions put together.
2 bids per region. its the simplest solution and in many ways more fair than anything else.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: pshao
- Re: only the best at nationals
- References:
- only the best at nationals
- From: luketcg
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Sun's Rising on a
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Sun's Rising on a
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Bobus
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Mimmo
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: Mike D
- Re: only the best at nationals
- From: eric . brach
- only the best at nationals
- Prev by Date: League Game Scheduling Question
- Next by Date: Re: Hodags recap of Centex
- Previous by thread: Re: only the best at nationals
- Next by thread: Re: only the best at nationals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|