Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: "Toad Leber" <tsl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 21:07:42 GMT
"Adam Tarr" <ahtarrNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message >
> More to the point, mixed every year isn't the only "PC" option. If
> we're restricted to one division, we could alternate open and women's,
> or we could rotate open/women's/mixed, or whatever.
Why do you have to be PC at all. Why not try to be AC (athleticly correct)
and allow only the best players from each country to compete so that you
showcase ultimate at its pinical. If one of them has to be a woman (which
would never happen in ulty) fine. Think about the sport for a change.
As for calling the division in which men compete in "mens", its simply a
matter being accurate.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: David Berney Needleman
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: RJD
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- References:
- talent vs chemistry
- From: Toad Leber
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: rollinnufffatter
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Toad Leber
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: rollinnufffatter
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Toad Leber
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: rollinnufffatter
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Toad Leber
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Adam Tarr
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Toad Leber
- Re: talent vs chemistry
- From: Adam Tarr
- talent vs chemistry
- Prev by Date: Re: talent vs chemistry
- Next by Date: Free $$ Tournament this weekend.
- Previous by thread: Re: talent vs chemistry
- Next by thread: Re: talent vs chemistry
- Index(es):