Re: Another rules question
- From: "Jon Bauman" <baumanj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Jul 2005 11:43:39 -0700
It's a travel.
The fact that the rule (XV.A) occurs in the receiver section does not
limit it's application to receivers. Note the other rules in that same
section. The term "receiver" is consistently used when application is
limited to receivers.
This has been covered a couple of times before.
rpgcaw2000@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In summer league a disc went up that I D'd and I continued to mac it
> down the field for an attempt at a Callahan. Is this legal? In the
> rules it says it's illegal to intentionally advance the disc in this
> manner, but that clause is under the guidelines for receivers and
> receivers is defined as an offensive player-which I was not. Is there
> anywhere else in the rules that would make what I did illegal? I feel
> like it should be illegal, but haven't found the rule that would say it
> is.
> -Robbie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another rules question
- From: pgw
- Re: Another rules question
- References:
- Another rules question
- From: rpgcaw2000
- Another rules question
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this guy from Wilmington?
- Next by Date: Re: Is this guy from Wilmington?
- Previous by thread: Re: Another rules question
- Next by thread: Re: Another rules question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|