Re: whingeland

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:56:50 +1000, alvey wrote:

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:47:21 -0800 (PST), arahim wrote:

On Jan 18, 5:49 am, eusebius <eusebiu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:41 pm, "subi...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <subi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

and hair was right to say, without any specific action, that the ball
did not have normal wear and tear, and that the pakistanis were up to
their voodoo, yes? meanwhile, anderson can use the seam as a nail file
and use his spikes to rough up the ball, and that is all tickety-boo?
that you cannot see discrepancy in the application of ball tampering
guidelines speaks volumes for your lack of bias.-

You are too stupid to realize that after Hair correctly applied the
laws in 2 cases and was punished for it (actually it was Hair and
Doctrove who applied the laws, but only Hair who was punished) no

Which begs the question why Hair? All the umpires' decisions were
upheld eventually even though the cheif referee deemed the umpires to
have overstepped.

A fine example of the inept inconsistency of the Rabids.

Please explain the basis of the "cheif (sic) referee's" decision that the
umpires "overstepped".

Would you also please supply a source for your claim that Madugalle said
that the umpires "overstepped".

Good comeback cobbler.

I'll assume that you can't answer or that I'm in your k/f. (And for that
very reason actually.)

max.it, would you mind asking Blog Boy the above questions? I'm keen on the
source of his "overstepping" statement as I can't recall/find it anywhere.




alvey
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Anderson made the most appaling statement by a Sport administrator in my entire life
    ... Hair making "the most appalling decision I have ever seen in my ... rather umpires who made their decisions by taking into account the ... precedence over all other Laws such that the Umpire has to take into ... YOU LYING, CONNIVING, MANIPULATING, SPINNING, PARANOID RACISTS can go to ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Anderson made the most appaling statement by a Sport administrator in my entire life
    ... Hair making "the most appalling decision I have ever seen in my entire ... rather umpires who made their decisions by taking into account the ... commercial well-being of the ICC and cricket boards! ... over all other Laws such that the Umpire has to take into account the ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Atherton on Hair
    ... It's fair to say that I am not a fan of Hair. ... I am upset that the Test was forfeited, and I do think the umpires were ... most umpires prosecute the laws as they are written. ... We are close in our positions, and I don't consider myself a Hair fan. ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: whingeland
    ... You are too stupid to realize that after Hair correctly applied the ... All the umpires' decisions were ... source of his "overstepping" statement as I can't recall/find it anywhere. ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Darryl Hair
    ... written - not as Hair applies them. ... not applied the Laws as written.he ... bucknor was right in not calling for 3rd umpires on a stumping etc. ... the technology IF it proven but the Umpires decision is correct no matter ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)