Re: Stupid Cricket Theories
- From: "Andrew Dunford" <adunford@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:39:15 +1200
"tendulkar.com" <tendulkar.com@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0c6e34e5-f15a-49f8-ac40-a1cf694cfa77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Similar to the Question posed by Andrew Fox, Here's a list of Cliche's
that commentators/players/ex-players use with absolutely no basis
1) All Decisions Even Out
2) A Fielder 100% knows whether he has caught the ball cleanly or not
3) You carry momentum into the next match (i.e if you score 674/6
there is no way in hell you'll get dismissed for 215)
4) If you can't defend 400, you deserve to lose
(Feel free to add yours)
I think you're misrepresenting 3). The claim I heard over and over was that it was actually England who carried the momentum forward by managing to scramble a draw in T1 which 'felt' like a victory.
Andrew
.
- References:
- Stupid Cricket Theories
- From: tendulkar.com
- Stupid Cricket Theories
- Prev by Date: Re: All wickets in an innings(5+ Wkts) to 1 bowler
- Next by Date: Re: biggest six hitters?
- Previous by thread: Re: Stupid Cricket Theories
- Next by thread: Re: Stupid Cricket Theories
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading