Re: why is everyone so anti US?OT
- From: jzfredricks <jzfredricks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:14:42 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 8, 12:42 pm, Bobs <mcaula...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
China, India, Indo.
None of this countries have any chance of a succesful invasion. None
of them have a navy with the capability to transport 100,000+ men and
armor, nor any carriers for air support, nor the technology, and most
importantly....they don't have the logistics. How are they going to
feed these people?
Like I said, the USA is the only country that can take down Australia
at the current time.
Sorry, I missed the 'current time' bit. I was thinking ahead a bit,
say in 5-10 years, or even a bit later if the reasoning was food/water
(which isn't a big issue today).
Obviously the US. What about Russia?
Also 'take down' probably needs defining. Is it 'make the federal
government surrender' or 'full occupation of the civilian population'?
.
- References:
- why is everyone so anti US?
- From: guyana
- Re: why is everyone so anti US?
- From: will_s
- Re: why is everyone so anti US?OT
- From: dechucka
- Re: why is everyone so anti US?OT
- From: jzfredricks
- Re: why is everyone so anti US?OT
- From: Bobs
- why is everyone so anti US?
- Prev by Date: Re: Aus selectors and Siddle
- Next by Date: Re: What a shit pitch
- Previous by thread: Re: why is everyone so anti US?OT
- Next by thread: Vijay Manjrekar batting with an injured hand
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|