Re: Judge would not ban Harbhajan even if 'monkey' taunt was true
- From: sudha <rajushah61@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:19:03 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 2:55 pm, "Mango" <Fakem...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"sudha" <rajusha...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eba631e4-86d6-42aa-aa67-170febde624f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 8:06 am, aravindan...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Because the video evidence Judge saw showed that Symonds started it,
for which Symonds also agrees, even if the alleged word was used, he
would not apply 3.3
Fromhttp://sport.guardian.co.uk/cricket/story/0,,2249546,00.html?gusrc=rs...
The Aussie media is spinning the ICC goof up big time. They have made
it look lke if harby's previous bans were known to Hansen he would
have banned Harby under 3.3.
Nonsense. All they have said is that the penalty would have been greater.
The penalty was applied at the low end of 2.8 because of provocation. If
the record had been known to Hansen then that mitigation would have been
counterbalanced by Harbhajan's record. It's still possible to be suspended
under 2.8.
If you read yesterday's Aussie media that is the impression one gets.
Aside, I would have liked to see two match ban on Harby and Symonds
both, or 2-1,1-2 etc. That would have made the officials look like
they will take a hard line on bad behaviour, but with ICC having a
baggage of not reporting Aussie playerss that is far away.
Aussie 4th worst behaved team? what a joke
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Precedents
- Next by Date: Re: Everyone should be happy about Harbhajan now
- Previous by thread: Re: Judge would not ban Harbhajan even if 'monkey' taunt was true
- Next by thread: Re: Judge would not ban Harbhajan even if 'monkey' taunt was true
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
