Re: Please use the right terminology

On Jan 31, 12:46 pm, Geico Caveman <spammers-go-h...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The entire Symonds-Harbhajan Singh saga is not "monkeygate", since no
evidence for that exists.

What it is is "framegate". While BCCI's over the top actions have allowed
the Aussies to start their whining, let us not lose sight of the essential
facts.

Harbhajan Singh was complimentary to Lee for his bowling.

Symonds (and possibly others), very likely through a pre-arranged plan
decided to start their mental disintegration games against a tailender who
was frustrating the hell out of their bowling.

Symonds used some nasty abuse against Harbhajan Singh. This has been
established. In doing so, he reneged on the deal the two had struck in
India. Takes a special kind of a chappie to do things like that.

Harbhajan Singh responded with abuse of his own. Abuse that did not include
any racial taunts (we have Tendulkar's positive testimony, Symonds own
coyness about what was said, and finally exposure of Hayden and Clarke's
initial lies to Procter).

The Aussies probably had a pre-arranged gameplan to frame Harbhajan Singh at
this point. The cheats (Ponting, Symonds, Clarke - funny how the same set
of moral lepers keep cropping up again and again) decided then to escalate
the issue. This was most definitely not the case of Symonds
misunderstanding Hindi/Punjabi abuse to mean something else. He and Ponting
kept at it for 2-3 weeks after the incident, turning down peacemaking
attempts by Kumble. Given his present coyness about not understanding what
was said, we can dispense with the notion that he ever believed that he had
been racially abused. The lying cove made it up all along. Ponting's
petulant harangues to an officiating umpire at the scene (Benson) suggests
that he wanted to get rid of Harbhajan Singh by any means possible.

Procter either fell for their game or was suitably induced / impressed by
this merry gang of cheats to participate in the framing of Harbhajan Singh.
His role needs to be investigated at some point.

The question is simple - in the society you live in, what do you call a set
of creatures who knowingly participate in the unprovoked baiting and
framing of someone they know to be hot-headed and dangerous to their
overall gameplan ?

Filthy scumballs is what I call them. And this entire affair deserves to be
called framegate from now on, because that is what it is.

Bunch of cheating, lying pieces of ***. Remember how McEnroe used to
play 10s, yell,badger,bully,cheat anything to win. You guys are
playing 11 Mac's dont have a prayer!
.

Quantcast