Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- From: Ian Galbraith <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:55:50 +1100
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:46:33 -0800 (PST), sarakita@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:06 am, Ian Galbraith <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:22:42 -0800 (PST), kiwicric...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip]
Given that the Aussies have made 3 such claims recently (in the last
15 days), may be these doods also need be told that specifically. But
if Rashid was taught this lesson in a hard way, why should an
exception be made for Ponting or Clarke?
Because they didn't drop it like Latif, why can you not grasp this
essential difference?
What do you think would have happened had Clarke been closer to the
boundary and touched that ball on the rope? Would that be out or a
4/6? According to you, since the catch had been completed before that
point of time, it should be out. But I am quite positive that no
umpire could/would have given that out.
If he rolled onto the rope it would have been 6 I assume, but he didn't
he rolled then when he went to get up he used the ball for leverage, at
that point he had control of his movements.
--
"You can turn a sour expression and an arguement over who's paying for
dinner into a moment of violent conflict ... but in general it's a lot
easier to create a false sense of jeopardy by pointing a loaded vampire
at your characters." - Charlie Stross
.
- References:
- Do players know watch a catch is?
- From: qarnos
- Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- From: kiwicricket
- Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- From: Ian Galbraith
- Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- From: sarakita
- Do players know watch a catch is?
- Prev by Date: Re: "There is no way I grounded that ball." Ricky Ponting
- Next by Date: Re: Monkeys are getting a bad rap for no good reason
- Previous by thread: Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- Next by thread: Re: Do players know watch a catch is?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
