Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: "Wog George" <wog-NotThisBit-george@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:48:45 GMT
"CricketLeague" <CricketlLeague@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13ftjj9bnijt6d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I should have used meteorology instead...
"Wog George" <wog-NotThisBit-george@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BMrLi.3423$H22.3223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"CricketLeague" <CricketlLeague@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13fse9d67l3ek0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Through the use of star charts, telepathy and hindsight, I can safely say
"Wog George" <wog-NotThisBit-george@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3gqLi.3401$H22.775@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"CricketLeague" <CricketlLeague@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13fsbji2vs20e85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you suggesting that Australia won't last 35 overs, and India won't
"Wog George" <wog-NotThisBit-george@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jsoLi.3368$H22.1245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Cricketer" <faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191052146.550547.302810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1) An additional fielder will be allowed outside the fielding circle
during the second or third Powerplays.
2) If an ODI innings is reduced, the numbers of overs making up each
of the three Powerplays shall be reduced proportionately.
3) If a bowler bowls a front foot no-ball, the following delivery
will
be deemed a free hit and the batsman cannot be dismissed by the
bowler
from that delivery. He can only be run out.
4) There will be a mandatory change of the ball after 35 overs of
each
innings; the replacement will be a clean used ball.
c & p from cricinfo
On point 4, why don't they just go back to what they used to do in
the World Series Cup? They would use 2 balls, one from each end.
The balls would only be 25 overs old each by the end of the match,
rather than this idea of playing with one ball for 35 overs and then
suddenly changing it for one in a significantly different condition.
Also, do you know how flexible the 35 over mark is? Consider that
the ball is damaged after 20 overs and is replaced. Would it still
be replaced prior to the commencement of over 36? Consider that the
ball is damaged halfway through the 35th over and is replaced. Do
they then replace it again 3 balls later? If the answer in the first
scenario is YES and the answer in the second scenario is NO, I wonder
where the "cut off" point is.
--
George
"Strike me down while you can, but it won't make your dried up
ovaries any more fertile." - Eric Cartman - 3 May 2006
Aus 107/4.........One more wicket in the next few overs and Aus will
be out of the match.....
Anything < 270 will be hard to defend for Aus....
need 35 overs?
Yes
that you were incorrect.
No
--
George
"If I was a towel, why would I be wearing this hat and this fake
moustache" - Steven McTowelie - 19 April 2006
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: CricketLeague
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- References:
- New rules for Aus vs India
- From: Cricketer
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: Wog George
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: CricketLeague
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: Wog George
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: CricketLeague
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: Wog George
- Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- From: CricketLeague
- New rules for Aus vs India
- Prev by Date: Re: Cricket South Africa
- Next by Date: Re: Cricket South Africa
- Previous by thread: Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- Next by thread: Re: New rules for Aus vs India
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|