Re: Sachin's Helmet before wicket by Hair

On 9 Jan 2006 01:14:41 -0800, "pash4life1973"
<pash4life1973@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Yeah but people saying it was plumb, is as equally stupid and ignorant
>and people saying it hit is helmet/head therefore could not be out.
>
>it was worth a shout...for an umpire to give it out it is still
>ridiculous...ithe ball pitched 1/2 way down the wicket, bouncing,

The problem was that it didn't bounce, bouncing halfway down the
wicket does not matter one iota, it's where it hit the batsman.

>hitting the batsmen shoulder at the top of its trajectory but slightly
>above stump height

and falling. It wasn't rising, it had already reached its height and
had started to fall. Entirely reasonable decision.

>...if the batsmen doesnt get the benefit of the doubt
>in that situation then there is really no point having the rule.

There was no doubt. It was out. The fact that it was an important
decision at an important point in the game does not matter. It was
still out.

>It might be worth understanding the decision in the context of the
>series (not just becuase tendulkar was the only indian batsmen showing
>he could bat, till VVS in Sydney)

Not true. As soon as I saw VVS bat in Adelaide I was certain he was
going to have an effect on the series. Someone has the comms I'm sure.
I think he went on to get 5 or something, but he looked good doing it.

>...however so many decisions went
>against the visiting team that summer...tendulkar got some ridiculous
>decisions...the aussie umpires rarely gave aussie batsmen out lbw and
>the aussies routinely got the benefit of the doubt. Suddenly tendulkar
>comes in, gets a close one which might or might not have hit the
>stumps...and hes gone.

he was out.

>It was also the same summer, where the aussie empire (cant remember
>who) graciously gave langer the benefit of the doubt, when he was
>blatantly caught behind behind against pakistan by saying he thought
>the bat handle cracked (which essentially robbed pakistan the victory
>and possibly the series).
>
>wonder who those blondes were at the start of the clip!


--
People who didn't need people needed people around to
know that they were the kind of people who didn't need
people.
--
Terry Pratchett, Maskerade.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sachins Helmet before wicket by Hair
    ... >>and people saying it hit is helmet/head therefore could not be out. ... >>decisions...the aussie umpires rarely gave aussie batsmen out lbw and ... We've been told umpteen times that it was absolutely plumb, ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Sachins Helmet before wicket by Hair
    ... Yeah but people saying it was plumb, is as equally stupid and ignorant ... and people saying it hit is helmet/head therefore could not be out. ... decisions...the aussie umpires rarely gave aussie batsmen out lbw and ... the bat handle cracked (which essentially robbed pakistan the victory ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • That looked like it hit the bat...
    ... They kept saying it "clearly hit his hand" but after a dozen replays ... it still looks like it hit the bat, ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: Who Sez Secrets Cannot be Kept?
    ... The saving grace is that they're 'spot checks', they're set up to hit 'likely' targets and they're usually not that secret.. ... Not saying you're wrong.. ... no amount of training will protect you from a ton of steel coming at you out of nowhere.. ... this one is more a public safety issue..Penalties for DUI are not really deterrents, so I have no issues with the spot-check idea to keep people honest.. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: AUSSIE FERALS AT IT AGAIN........
    ... >> No but saying Aussie Ferrals at it again, ... > cheat, they'd all be hypocrites (even though they wouldn't be, but ... Actually I was saying I don't care what anyone yells out unless its racist. ... for cheating, and not suspected of cheating, actually cheating, then you are ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)