Re: India should be ready for a big Pakistani surprise

R. Bharat Rao wrote:
> "dp" <dpusenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135954042.676747.245330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > prakmel2005@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> >would
> >> > even think it was you that was posting. There was no attempt at
> >> > subterfuge,
> >>
> >> ROFL. Hope you believe it.
> >
> > So do you really think there was an attempt at subterfuge? They both
> > posted with their email id's and names in the header. Only place your
> > name appeared was in the body of the text. Don't you think most people
> > would know that it was Bharat and Mike posting and just signing off as
> > Prakash? Would anyone actually mistake those posts as really written by
> > you [which is what subterfuge would imply]?
>
> Shhhh dp -- why ruin his self image. Some people's lives are so unimportant
> that they actually think their internet persona is worth something.

At least you clearly did by trying to use my name. Must be
understandably ashamed of the name Bharat as you are synonymous with
lying and pretending to be what and who you are not.

>Not
> only
> to themselves, but that two other people would elaborately plan something
> together.

Don't talk in the hypothetical. Swear that you didn't, that you both
independently thought of the same dumb idea on the same day within a
few hours, and that you have not met Mike.

>Not only that, they assume everyone is as brain-cell deprived as
> they are, and upon seeing a posting with the name "Prakash" would never
> bother to check the attributions or the posting, and would attribute it to
> the
> "real Prakash."

So if all people bother to check, why did you both bother to write my
name at the bottom of your post? Were you just trying to cheat
yourselves? If so, mustn't have been difficult at all.

>
> And the entire world

Even better than the population of India which was your claim last
time. Where are you headed next? Do you really have delusions of
grandeur?

>can tell him that there was no attempt at subterfuge
> (if
> he knows what the word means), but he won't believe it. So don't bother
> wasting your breath -- or bits and bytes in this case. The bozo doesn't
> know
> the first thing about the internet, so trying to explain headers, let alone
> internet
> posting traditions,

So show where in your traditions and Etiquette that you proudly seemed
to claim to know does it say that you are allowed to write another's
name at the bottom of your post? Simply because other imposters have
done it must be your flawed reasoning. Guess you also justify forging
cheques because others have.

>is a waste of time. In this case, the horse will not
> learn
> how to sing, no matter how hard you try...

If you want to call yourself a horse, go right ahead.

>
> I'd strongly wager

We are back to your gambling habits.

> "Prakash" is a first year undergrad or grad student,

Do you really think so? In recent days you said IIRC that I was a 5th
year student, then that I had the IQ of a turnip and now a first year
undergrad, or a grad student. That's 4 guesses - just like in Roulette
where you guess red, black, 0 and 00. My friend, your gambling habits
clearly die hard

Also a fairly confused person - and a liar in addition. Are you proud
of these achievements?

who
> just "discovered" the internet. Sitting behind his keyboard he paints
> elaborate
> fantastical pictures of himself as a grand emperor, of whom everyone
> thinks about, whereas the truth is that he is a wet behind the ears, nose
> leaking, pimple scratching adolescent, for whom this is a vicarious escape
> from his daily life. So don't disturb his fantasies...

As I said many times before, do not try thinking for me. You clearly
and understandably are disturbed with your life that you always try to
imagine that you know me. Fortunately not - because I would not want to
know any out and out liar like you who is a coward and tries to deceive
- but fails.

>
> Bharat [now waiting for the "I was only kidding" posts from Prakash]

And there he goes imagining again.

Anyway why do you bother putting your name to your posts.

Using your own flawed logic and using some of the words written above
by you, do you assume that 'everyone is as brain-cell deprived' as you
that they need to see the name "Bharat" in your posts tobe sure it is
you because they would never bother to check the attributions or the
posting? See how idiotic you are. Caught once again.

So let me remind you again what you are supposed to do to try and
regain some credibility:

1. Since you have claimed anybody can check from the attributions,
kindly explain:

(a) What purpose is there of putting a name to a post?
(b) Since you have pretended to be knowlegeable of Netiquette, give me
links to some authorities which says you are allowed to write somebody
else's name at the bottom of your post.
(c) Why do you sign virtually all if not all your posts?
(d) Why you put my name to your post?

2. GIVE A FEW INSTANCES where I have used the exact words quoted by you
of "you are well known for". This is from my previous post.

3. You have also claimed that I have twisted facts. Give any examples
you have.

If you wish to have the examples of where you have been caught
twisting, say so. They have been pointed out to you already but you
have ignored because you have been caught cheating.

4. Swear that you and Mike didn't discuss to post with my name, that
you both independently thought of the same dumb idea on the same day
within a few hours, and that you have not met Mike.

As long as you swear your answers, I will take it to be what you claim
of independently thinking of this idea as the whole truth.

However, I expect that you will ignore this post because I am confident
that I am correct about the first 3 items and reasonably sure of the
fourth since I don't expect even you will be willing to swear.

And if you ignore, it is game,set and match.

QED, my dear friend Bharat who is in a soup which he thoroughly
deserves.

And try this time my friend to stick to your own brains and not those
of others.

Promise :-)

Didn't think so.

Prakash

P.S. With the New Year coming up, perhaps your one and only resolution
should be that you will be honest from now on. Tough call but my dear
Bharat, you may be able to do so if you realise the folly of your ways.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: India should be ready for a big Pakistani surprise
    ... >>> Prakash ... > ROFL Bharat. ... If you even remotely the veteran of rsc that you claim to be (with your "you ... ABC's of netiquette before posting in future) -- we posted under our own ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: India should be ready for a big Pakistani surprise
    ... Swear that you didn't, ... You have clearly displayed a complete lack of understanding of the internet. ... >> bother to check the attributions or the posting, ... > that they need to see the name "Bharat" in your posts tobe sure it is ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Cowboys herding cats
    ... Do those words bother you more than an outright statement? ... What about my posting questions? ... If I do run into any rasff regulars at Balticon, ... I will discuss how I come across on rasff with them. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: More illegal immigrants fleeing Dominican Republic
    ... [snip portions of PL's posting recently debunked here, ... hence the quote in the Wayne Smith article. ... bother to deny it! ... as the original posting here shows. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: Errors when trying to print
    ... Follow the flow of the conversation. ... for example- a network printer and completely waste their time if it is ... And changing the flow of the posts- changing to top posting after bottom ... won't bother trying and you lose help. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)