More on third umpires
- From: "amukhop" <anirban.mukhopadhyay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 03:00:25 -0700
Interesting incidents during the NZ-Zim odo.
Off-spinner Ewing bowls to Oram, who hits back a checked drive. Ewing
kneels and scoops a catch at ground level. Celebrations straightaway.
Oram stands his ground. Ewing and Taibu turn to the leg umpire Harper.
The two umpires consult. Commentators say - inconclusive, we'll go to
the third umpire. But meanwhile the on-field umpires have decided it's
not out. Zims cannot believe it, but get back to bowling. A replay is
screened -- commentator Shastri says clearly not out, what was Gavin
Ewing doing, against the spirit of the game, etc. Other commentator
Mbangwa steps in and says he thought it was a legal catch. Replay
screened again -- shows that the ball had bounced in Ewing's hand, so
it should have been out.
Post script 1. Shastri says he feels the on-field umpires should always
decide. (Huh?)
Post script 2. Oram gets a dodgy LBW two balls later trying to reverse
sweep. (Should they have been able to check upstairs?)
Post script 3. NZ at 150/7 in the 34th. (Say what?)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More on third umpires
- From: Mad Hamish
- Re: More on third umpires
- From: Andrew Dunford
- Re: More on third umpires
- Prev by Date: Re: The excuse bucket o'erfloweth
- Next by Date: Re: The excuse bucket o'erfloweth
- Previous by thread: Bombay domestic team
- Next by thread: Re: More on third umpires
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|