Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: Simon Pleasants <plesbit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:00:29 +0100
On 25 Jul 2005 23:33:39 -0700, "Aditya Basrur"
<sandaas_rocks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The fact that Victoria had 9+ children has since made them reasonably
>inbred, with one of her descendants gracing almost each family in
>Europe. Indeed, if Wills wants to marry within royalty, he'll almost
>certainly have to marry a cousin of some description. It's reminiscent
>of one or two Indian communities to which I belong.
IIRC, and I might not, it used to be more or less a "rule" that
royalty could only marry royalty. However that has stopped so there'd
be nothing to stop Wills marrying Britney Spears, should he feel so
inclined (unless of course it during one of those periods when she's
already married).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: aditya.basrur@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- References:
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: Simon Pleasants
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: alvey
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: Simon Pleasants
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: kenhiggs8
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- From: Aditya Basrur
- Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Knee-jerk reactions
- Next by Date: What's a spectacular bowling performance in an Ashes series?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|