Re: Who's Who
- From: "lfigueroa" <lfigueroa@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:15:40 GMT
What a waste.
Back in the bit bin you go, Ms Li.
Lou Figueroa
>> "Debra Li" <dli41075@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
Aunty Dan
I've always been polite and respectful to you. From now on you can kiss
my ass.
"lfigueroa" <lfigueroa@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4EFgf.147466$zb5.58224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Aunty has made such a rational case in his response to Ms Li that I am
> going to unplonk her for the sole purpose of seeing her response.
>
> Lou Figueroa
>
> "Aunty Dan" <auntydan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:jvBgf.604$4v.413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Debra Li" <dli41075@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1132637171.270180.90490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> You are wrong.
>> If I'm wrong please post some links to on-topic posts you have made, here
>> or on AZB. I'd love to be proven wrong about this and am genuninely
>> interested to read them. I come here to learn and am willing to listen to
>> (almost) anyone who is interested in sharing knowledge. Please post some
>> links to the articles you have written, the important lessons you have
>> learnt, the practice routines you used, the tournament experiences that
>> helped you learn and grow as a player, the bitter defeats that you were
>> able to recover from, the triumps and how you achieved them.
>>
>>> If you don't like what I write, plonk me and leave it at that. If you
>>> had a problem with me at Az, why didn't you ever bring it up?
>> Why can't I reply if I want to? Why can't I point out what I perceive as
>> the flaws in your argument and give you a chance to argue your case?
>> Isn't that always your justification when you get into flame wars and
>> people criticize you for it? Why are you the only one allowed to critize
>> people here?
>> I don't do this on AZB because I respect it's moderated format, and
>> everything I've ever seen you post there is, appropriately, in the
>> Non-Pool forum, so I have no problem with that, in and of itself. On RSB
>> I ignore most every flame war, becuase it has nothing to do with Pool and
>> I am a mature enough person to be able to moderate myself. I have
>> bothered to reply to this thread because you are claiming in this thread
>> to be one of the people here with as much knowledge as Bob Jewett. If
>> this is the case I'd be genuninely interested in you sharing such
>> knowledge. I have learnt much from Bob's posts here and I'm sure I could
>> learn from you. If you listen you may also learn just from the questions
>> being asked.
>>
>>> In the past when I have brought up pool related topics on this NG,
>>> I was put down, called a liar (because I said I could run out a rack of
>>> 8 ball on a barbox - wooooooooooo) so whats the use?
>> Did I do that? Did EVERYONE on EVERY board do that? And why can't you
>> just follow your own advice to me and plonk the people who offended you?
>> Clearly anyone with any experience knows you have to expect a percentage
>> of idiots on any Internet forum, most especially ones like RSB that are
>> unmoderated. If you really hate ALL people here why do you come back?
>> Now, unfortunately, you are sounding exactly like Mr. Guninger, always
>> complaining how this board is full of idiots who are not worthy of your
>> talents, and yet continuung to return here again and again. I just don't
>> understand this.
>>
>>> When Larry finally agreed to leave RSB, people started antagonizing him
>>> in an attempt to get him to return. I was not even posting here at all,
>>> yet I was being blamed for that - incorrectly.
>> But you spent months hounding Mr. Guninger here yourself. You are as much
>> a part of that particular problem as the others who contributed. And what
>> does that have to do with my point about you never posting anything
>> on-topic? Who cares what Mr. Guninger does or says here? Why does he, or
>> others who critize him, have any control over your behavior here?
>>
>>> Yet, if Pat says it, it must be true. Pat is a big liar and a coward.
>> Have I mentioned Pat? Has this anything to do with my points about you
>> never contributing a single on-topic post? Has your opinion about Pat
>> have anything to do with Pool?
>>
>>> All the while, I was being hounded by Splinterhands and Rolloff (on both
>>> forums)
>> So much the drama, so little the caring. Why could you not take your own
>> advice to me and just ignore them? And perhaps if you have made yourself
>> a valued member of the community by actually contributing on-topic posts
>> on either AZB or RSB (I Can't talk for CCB as I haven't been there in
>> ages) other people would actually care. So far as I can see you haven't
>> so they don't. There is always time to change this though.
>>
>>> If you haven't noticed, I am no longer posting at Az or CCB.
>> I haven't, because again you've never posted anything I've ever seen
>> outside of the NPR forum.
>>
>>> If I'm such a problem, start one of those poll threads to see how many
>>> people want me to stay away.
>> I didn't say you were a problem on AZB, as you are moderated confine
>> yourself to the NPR which is what it is there for. I find your presence
>> there irrelevant. What I have a problem with is you here acting as
>> another whining, boring, pointless idiot and then claiming in this thread
>> that you are not. We have quite enough people like that here already
>> thank you.
>>
>>> I may not post like Bob Jewett or Scott Lee or Randyg, but I'm not
>>> stupid
>>> either.
>> I didn't say you were, just that you had presented no evidence to the
>> contrary so far.
>>
>>> What you said about me applies to many people, such as Eydie,
>>> Wendy, Landshark, Marissa, and many others. Would you like for me to
>>> make an ass out of myself like Scott (the snapshot guy) and post BS and
>>> try to pass myself off as an expert?
>> I didn't say it didn't apply to other people, but they are posting here
>> claiming to know as much about playing Pool as you have just done.
>> Frankly before you made this post I had you categorized with those
>> posters you mentioned and was happily tolerating you. I have no animosity
>> against people for whom such forums are mostly just a social meeting
>> place, I just have little interest in having conversations with them for
>> the sake of having conversations.
>> I certainly don't waste my time criticizing everyone I find annoying.
>> Down that road lies madness, flame wars and Mr. Guninger. But this thread
>> is not about OTHER people's actions, it's about YOURS. However if you
>> want to defend you actions to me (as clearly you do or you would not have
>> bothered replying) then please do so by addressing MY questions to YOU.
>>
>>> No. I follow Fast Eddie's advice
>>> - I am being myself, on purpose. It's all I know how to be. If that's
>>> not good enough for you and everybody else, too bad.
>> I'm just personally sick of the "I could tell you so much but you're not
>> worth it." If you don't ever intend to post anything on-topic fine, it's
>> your life and your choice. Just please stop telling us how much you know
>> if you are never going to back your claims up. If YOU want act like an
>> idiot in public go right on ahead, but PLEASE stop blaming everyone else,
>> you are clearly intelligent enough to know the difference between things
>> you choose to do and things you have to do.
>>
>> ** REMEMBER - Just don't reply to this thread and I'll know you have no
>> interest in what I think of you and be happy to utterly ignore you from
>> here on out. **
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Who's Who
- From: poolguyusaone
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Ricky W. King
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Debra Li
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Aunty Dan
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Debra Li
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Aunty Dan
- Re: Who's Who
- From: lfigueroa
- Who's Who
- Prev by Date: Re: This site simply SUCKS. I can't believe how good it USED to be
- Next by Date: Re: Who's Who
- Previous by thread: Re: Who's Who
- Next by thread: Re: Who's Who
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
