Re: Who's Who
- From: "lfigueroa" <lfigueroa@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:09:04 GMT
Aunty has made such a rational case in his response to Ms Li that I am going
to unplonk her for the sole purpose of seeing her response.
Lou Figueroa
"Aunty Dan" <auntydan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jvBgf.604$4v.413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Debra Li" <dli41075@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1132637171.270180.90490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> You are wrong.
> If I'm wrong please post some links to on-topic posts you have made, here
> or on AZB. I'd love to be proven wrong about this and am genuninely
> interested to read them. I come here to learn and am willing to listen to
> (almost) anyone who is interested in sharing knowledge. Please post some
> links to the articles you have written, the important lessons you have
> learnt, the practice routines you used, the tournament experiences that
> helped you learn and grow as a player, the bitter defeats that you were
> able to recover from, the triumps and how you achieved them.
>
>> If you don't like what I write, plonk me and leave it at that. If you had
>> a problem with me at Az, why didn't you ever bring it up?
> Why can't I reply if I want to? Why can't I point out what I perceive as
> the flaws in your argument and give you a chance to argue your case? Isn't
> that always your justification when you get into flame wars and people
> criticize you for it? Why are you the only one allowed to critize people
> here?
> I don't do this on AZB because I respect it's moderated format, and
> everything I've ever seen you post there is, appropriately, in the
> Non-Pool forum, so I have no problem with that, in and of itself. On RSB I
> ignore most every flame war, becuase it has nothing to do with Pool and I
> am a mature enough person to be able to moderate myself. I have bothered
> to reply to this thread because you are claiming in this thread to be one
> of the people here with as much knowledge as Bob Jewett. If this is the
> case I'd be genuninely interested in you sharing such knowledge. I have
> learnt much from Bob's posts here and I'm sure I could learn from you. If
> you listen you may also learn just from the questions being asked.
>
>> In the past when I have brought up pool related topics on this NG,
>> I was put down, called a liar (because I said I could run out a rack of
>> 8 ball on a barbox - wooooooooooo) so whats the use?
> Did I do that? Did EVERYONE on EVERY board do that? And why can't you just
> follow your own advice to me and plonk the people who offended you?
> Clearly anyone with any experience knows you have to expect a percentage
> of idiots on any Internet forum, most especially ones like RSB that are
> unmoderated. If you really hate ALL people here why do you come back? Now,
> unfortunately, you are sounding exactly like Mr. Guninger, always
> complaining how this board is full of idiots who are not worthy of your
> talents, and yet continuung to return here again and again. I just don't
> understand this.
>
>> When Larry finally agreed to leave RSB, people started antagonizing him
>> in an attempt to get him to return. I was not even posting here at all,
>> yet I was being blamed for that - incorrectly.
> But you spent months hounding Mr. Guninger here yourself. You are as much
> a part of that particular problem as the others who contributed. And what
> does that have to do with my point about you never posting anything
> on-topic? Who cares what Mr. Guninger does or says here? Why does he, or
> others who critize him, have any control over your behavior here?
>
>> Yet, if Pat says it, it must be true. Pat is a big liar and a coward.
> Have I mentioned Pat? Has this anything to do with my points about you
> never contributing a single on-topic post? Has your opinion about Pat have
> anything to do with Pool?
>
>> All the while, I was being hounded by Splinterhands and Rolloff (on both
>> forums)
> So much the drama, so little the caring. Why could you not take your own
> advice to me and just ignore them? And perhaps if you have made yourself a
> valued member of the community by actually contributing on-topic posts on
> either AZB or RSB (I Can't talk for CCB as I haven't been there in ages)
> other people would actually care. So far as I can see you haven't so they
> don't. There is always time to change this though.
>
>> If you haven't noticed, I am no longer posting at Az or CCB.
> I haven't, because again you've never posted anything I've ever seen
> outside of the NPR forum.
>
>> If I'm such a problem, start one of those poll threads to see how many
>> people want me to stay away.
> I didn't say you were a problem on AZB, as you are moderated confine
> yourself to the NPR which is what it is there for. I find your presence
> there irrelevant. What I have a problem with is you here acting as another
> whining, boring, pointless idiot and then claiming in this thread that you
> are not. We have quite enough people like that here already thank you.
>
>> I may not post like Bob Jewett or Scott Lee or Randyg, but I'm not stupid
>> either.
> I didn't say you were, just that you had presented no evidence to the
> contrary so far.
>
>> What you said about me applies to many people, such as Eydie,
>> Wendy, Landshark, Marissa, and many others. Would you like for me to
>> make an ass out of myself like Scott (the snapshot guy) and post BS and
>> try to pass myself off as an expert?
> I didn't say it didn't apply to other people, but they are posting here
> claiming to know as much about playing Pool as you have just done. Frankly
> before you made this post I had you categorized with those posters you
> mentioned and was happily tolerating you. I have no animosity against
> people for whom such forums are mostly just a social meeting place, I just
> have little interest in having conversations with them for the sake of
> having conversations.
> I certainly don't waste my time criticizing everyone I find annoying. Down
> that road lies madness, flame wars and Mr. Guninger. But this thread is
> not about OTHER people's actions, it's about YOURS. However if you want to
> defend you actions to me (as clearly you do or you would not have bothered
> replying) then please do so by addressing MY questions to YOU.
>
>> No. I follow Fast Eddie's advice
>> - I am being myself, on purpose. It's all I know how to be. If that's
>> not good enough for you and everybody else, too bad.
> I'm just personally sick of the "I could tell you so much but you're not
> worth it." If you don't ever intend to post anything on-topic fine, it's
> your life and your choice. Just please stop telling us how much you know
> if you are never going to back your claims up. If YOU want act like an
> idiot in public go right on ahead, but PLEASE stop blaming everyone else,
> you are clearly intelligent enough to know the difference between things
> you choose to do and things you have to do.
>
> ** REMEMBER - Just don't reply to this thread and I'll know you have no
> interest in what I think of you and be happy to utterly ignore you from
> here on out. **
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Donald Tees
- Re: Who's Who
- From: lfigueroa
- Re: Who's Who
- From: thesquireone
- Re: Who's Who
- References:
- Who's Who
- From: poolguyusaone
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Ricky W. King
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Debra Li
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Aunty Dan
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Debra Li
- Re: Who's Who
- From: Aunty Dan
- Who's Who
- Prev by Date: Re: This site simply SUCKS. I can't believe how good it USED to be
- Next by Date: Re: Who's Who
- Previous by thread: Re: Who's Who
- Next by thread: Re: Who's Who
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
