Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: "ottomatic" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:16:22 GMT
"lfigueroa" <lfigueroa@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B3pYe.291714$5N3.98732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'd rather not say...
>
> But just taking a stab in the dark, if you were to do a search for
> (mis)usage of the phrase "a game of stakes" I'm betting you could figure
it
> out :-)
good tip Holms
I did my due diligence and have ascertained the culprit
God, I hope I don't misspell anything...
a question comes to mind
I assume the 'couple' does some crossdressing on usenet<one computer, two
persons>
which one do you think is posting, the HO or the Drunkard?
inquiring minds...
Otto
>
> Lou Figueroa
>
> "Gregory" <greyegg153@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:vfiYe.14$cT.7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > luigi says
> >> reminds me of someone
> >> else who use to post here and get all puffed up and turned around and
> > their
> >> panties in a bid old wad over nothing but their own
> > misinterpretations.
> >
> > Who's that?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Rule Interpretation
- From: SteveE
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: Studeman
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: lfigueroa
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: Studeman
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: Dick
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: lfigueroa
- Re: Rule Interpretation
- From: lfigueroa
- Rule Interpretation
- Prev by Date: Re: why 9 ball?
- Next by Date: Re: Care for leather pockets
- Previous by thread: Re: Rule Interpretation
- Next by thread: Re: Rule Interpretation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|