Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: "Roberto" <Roberto@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:44:58 -0600
"Constance Reeder" <constance@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnf6g7iq.95v.constance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2007-06-07, Roberto <Roberto@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The league office has shown judgment before. They could have done it
again.
Not on that rule. It has no teeth if it can be ignored.
If Stoudamire had reversed his *own* field in response to the calls
from the bench, there might have been some wiggle room. But no, he
had to be restrained, and in my opinion that means he has to be
suspended.
This while the rest of us would have been entertained with a real Suns-Spurs
series.
--
I don't want to get to the end of my life and find I have just
lived the length of it. I want to have lived the width of it as
well. -- Diane Ackerman
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Constance Reeder
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- References:
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: stephenj
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Constance Reeder
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Neil Cerutti
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: James Farrar
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Neil Cerutti
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: James Farrar
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Neil Cerutti
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Roberto
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Neil Cerutti
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Roberto
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- From: Constance Reeder
- Re: Lucky Spurs
- Prev by Date: News from June 6, 2007
- Next by Date: Re: Lucky Spurs
- Previous by thread: Re: Lucky Spurs
- Next by thread: Re: Lucky Spurs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading