Re: kookdancers digest

To see which posters are so-called "kookdancers", simply watch
which ones post a response and add a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups
to the distribution. Another good indicator is to note which of
those responders follow a person to one or more of those irrelevant
newsgroups and engage in their antagonism there. Also look for
those that are proud of the number of disruptive postings they make
to the newsgroups or who pontificate about the multiple newsgroups
being relevant. Those who waste their time on meaningless "kook"
polls also fall into the category. Another sign are those who
hypocritically complain about the same "tripe" being posted over and
over while posting the same "tripe" over and over, who talk of
cowardice and yet post with a fake name, who laugh about someone
allegedly running away and yet run away from questions asked of them,
and who tell others to shut up but won't shut up themselves.

===========================================================================

Art Deco writes:

2607> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

2607> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
2607> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spewed the following output from the Holy
2607> Digestor to usenet:

2607> How ironic.

2607> How ironic.

2607> Once again, as predicted:

2607> Why should I bother to explain it to you, Gigi, when:

" *clip* - *clop* *clip* - *clop* "
--Art Deco

How ironic.

2607> a) You can't understand it
2607> b) You won't reply to it
2607> c) You'll sneck the context like the coward you are
2607> d) You'll just dump it into the Holy Digestor

2607> Continue kookdancing, Gigi.

2607> Classic pontification.

2607> How ironic.

2607> How ironic.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> How ironic.

2607> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

2607> Illogical.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic evasion of the point.

2607> How many times have you posted the word "classic" over the last fifteen
2607> years, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Now, what do your repetitive and off-topic "digests" have to do with
2607> classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic lack of specificity.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic inconsistency.

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Ambiguous.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Note: no response. No surprise there, really.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Still suffering from writing problems, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Illogical.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> Note: no response. No surprise there, really.

2607> Classic inconsistency.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic evasion of the point.

2607> Who are these alleged "people", Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Shut up, Classic Tholenator(tm).

2607> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

2607> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
2607> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spewed the following output from the Holy
2607> Digestor to usenet:

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Note: no response. No surprise there, really.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

2607> How ironic.

2607> How ironic.

2607> Once again, as predicted:

2607> Why should I bother to explain it to you, Gigi, when:

" *clip* - *clop* *clip* - *clop* "
--Art Deco

How ironic.

2607> a) You can't understand it
2607> b) You won't reply to it
2607> c) You'll sneck the context like the coward you are
2607> d) You'll just dump it into the Holy Digestor

2607> Continue kookdancing, Gigi.

2607> Classic pontification.

2607> How ironic.

2607> How ironic.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> How ironic.

2607> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

2607> Illogical.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic evasion of the point.

2607> How many times have you posted the word "classic" over the last fifteen
2607> years, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Now, what do your repetitive and off-topic "digests" have to do with
2607> OS/2 or astronomy, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic lack of specificity.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic
2607> Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic
2607> Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

2607> Classic inconsistency.

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic
2607> Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic
2607> Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic
2607> Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Ambiguous.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Note: no response. No surprise there, really.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Still suffering from writing problems, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> Illogical.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> Note: no response. No surprise there, really.

2607> Classic inconsistency.

2607> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
2607> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

2607> Classic inappropriate analogy.

2607> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

2607> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
2607> argument.

2607> Classic evasion of the point.

2607> Who are these alleged "people", Classic Tholenator(tm)?

2607> What does this have to do with OS/2 or astronomy, Classic

2607> Shut up, Classic Tholenator(tm).

2608> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

2608> You are back now, enjoy!

2609> Newsgroups: alt.consciousness.4th-way,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,alt.mindcontrol

2609> He has both hands firmly fixed to the cranks on the Holy Digestor,
2609> Bruce.

2610> Newsgroups: alt.consciousness.4th-way,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,alt.mindcontrol

2610> A plausible theory, Bruce. Did you ever hear about how Art Bell
2610> super-glued his lips together during his radio show, then used the
2610> event in promos? How stupid is that?

2611> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2611> Is that true, Bruce?

2612> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2612> He should be slotted as guest on the Oprah Winfrey show, Bruce, Holy
2612> Digestor and all.

2612> None at all, Bruce.

2612> I'm hoping to upgrade my Classic Tholenator(tm) quote, Bruce, but he is
2612> so repetitive and robotic that it is a quite difficult quest. I
2612> thought the punctuation error was a nice feature in this one, however.

2613> Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical

2613> He's a coward, Bruce.

2613> All becomes input for the Holy Digestor, Bruce.

===========================================================================

Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:

2312> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,rec.sport.basketball.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks

2312> Let me guess, you can't find a clue, shithead. I wonder why that is -

2313> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,rec.sport.basketball.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks

2313> What's up ringmaster? Pulled your head out yet?

2314> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks

2314> <Bruce AKA Art Deco's excellent comments taken out of context by
2314> Dickless Davie snipped>

2314> Classic repetition.

2314> <My excellent comments taken out of context by Dickless Davie snipped>

2314> I don't owe you an explanation, Bruce. Especially when you don't
2314> respond or evade any questions put to you. Then you gutlessly take any
2314> and all replies and digest them. That's called classic hypocracy,
2314> Bruce. If you weren't so dickless, you'd know that.

2314> <Retard's comments snipped. Who gives a fig about this fart lamer
2314> anyway>

2314> What's the matter, Bruce? Upset about your KKI score?

2314> Who are these "some people" you keep crapping on about, Bruce?

2314> Nearly 10% of last year's total and its barely a month into the new
2314> digest. That means the new total will exceed the previous year's total
2314> well before the year is out. Nice going, Dickless.

2315> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2315> Its no surprise that Dickless Davie would be impotent, Bruce.

2315> Depends on her placement on the lits. I'm sure she wouldn't want to be
2315> caught between Bohne and Double-A, Bruce.

2316> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2316> NO POOFTAS!

2316> That includes shitheads like Chuckles de rodeo clown and Raving Loonie
2316> the horse's arse -

2317> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell

2317> Here's proof that the canuck fuckhead Raving Loonie is a horse's arse -

2317> Watch as we see Triple-A launch Chuckles de rodeo clown and Raving
2317> Roonie take his favourite buttplug, Chuckles, up the arse.

2318> Newsgroups: alt.consciousness.4th-way,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,alt.mindcontrol

2318> Now, why can't Dickless Davie be more like this kook?

2319> Newsgroups: alt.consciousness.4th-way,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,alt.mindcontrol

2319> Too much super glue do you think, Bruce?

2320> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2320> NO POOFTAHS!

2320> Yes, I know, Bruce. Unfortunately, Dickless Davie doesn't even know
2320> where to begin. However, he's making good headway (if you pardon the
2320> pun) on his clown outfit.

2321> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2321> Yes, Bruce. Davie has no ***.

2321> No wonder he's a shithead, Bruce.

2322> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2322> No surprise really, Bruce.

2322> NO POOFTAHS!

2322> It explains the brown hair, Bruce.

2323> Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

2323> Yes, it certainly looks like it, Bruce.

2323> Has anyone done a KATscan of Dickless Davie, Bruce?

2323> 1

2323> 2

2323> 3

2323> 4

2323> 5

2323> Looks like a full hand to me, Bruce.

2324> Newsgroups: ne.weather,alt.astrology,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks

2324> Davie Tholen! Is that you?

2325> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

2325> NO POOFTAHS!

2325> Its just Chuckles looking for a clue, Bruce. Not sure why he thinks
2325> he'll find one up the raving loonie though.

===========================================================================

Ross writes:

430> Melodious Thunk pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
430> this in news:replyto-BB6CC8.12495223062005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

430> [...]

430> I see. Thanks for the info. I know of musical ensemble experiments,
430> using fiber optic cable connections and once the mileage exceeds 1000
430> miles, latency reared its ugly head.

431> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

431> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
431> in news:230620051733027889%art_deco@xxxxxxxxx:

431> I'm not sure. I think it is a "list o' rage",

431> as he contemplates his impotence at removing 'antagonists' from Usenet.

431> She will be in good company.

432> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
432> this in news:ffEue.22896$h86.19347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

432> Davie,

432> if you want to discuss music, keep it out of your digests.

432> <sigh> Go back and read my statement. I mentioned a number of North
432> American bands that are considered 'world class' and I qualified it as
432> such. I chose not to mention any of the very fine European orchestas.

432> Note: No response.

432> Great. Now we get to see you playing petty games with semantics.

432> So, I've described my thought on the subject.

432> What are yours?

432> What makes for a first rate orchestra for you?

432> I see. You are builing a new Strawman argument, merely because I chose
432> to restrict a small list of excellent orchestras to North America.

432> Your intellectual dishonesty is noted,

432> Davie.

432> ???

432> Nightingale asked me a question and I answered it.

432> Your statement 'does not follow'.

432> If you choose to indulge in your intellectualy dishonest form of
432> rhetoric,

432> it is no wonder that to you the rest of Usenet appears to be full of
432> 'antagonists'.

432> You created them for yourself -- enjoy.

433> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

433> Wee Davie pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
433> in news:ffEue.22896$h86.19347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 19 fine posts by Mr.Deco.]
433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 15 fine posts by MBB.]
433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 10 boring posts by Raving
433> Loonie.]

433> Who is 'Rosss',

433> Davie?

433> Your solution is simple, Davie:

433> stop posting digests and the clutter will be greatly reduced.

433> It might take a little time for the responses to clear,

433> but your efforts in digesting is doing nothing to 'reduce the
433> clutter'.

433> Of course you do.

433> If you didn't take me seriously, you wouldn't compile my
433> posts into your digests.

433> Why should I answer any of your strawman questions?

433> It is an intellectually dishonest technique you use,

433> distracting someone from a point when you are about to lose it.

433> Thanks for presenting evidence that establishes my point.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> Evasion Noted.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> IBID.

433> Despite your claim, it still was a lie.

433> You've lied about your lie.

433> What claim?

433> Typical Tholen lies.

433> I like my quote of you better: See it in my .sig.

433> [chomp]

433> Keep music stuff out of Teh Holy Digestor(tm), Davie.

433> I see you are building that collection of strawman arguments.

433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 2 fine posts by Fred Hall]
433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 1 fine post by Michael
433> Lockhart]
433> [snip the output of Teh Holy Digestor(tm) on 1 fine post by Joe Malloy]

434> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

434> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
434> this in news:ffEue.22896$h86.19347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

434> Davie,

434> if you want to discuss music, keep it out of your digests.

434> <sigh> Go back and read my statement. I mentioned a number of North
434> American bands that are considered 'world class' and I qualified it as
434> such. I chose not to mention any of the very fine European orchestas.

434> Note: No response.

434> Great. Now we get to see you playing petty games with semantics.

434> So, I've described my thought on the subject.

434> What are yours?

434> What makes for a first rate orchestra for you?

434> I see. You are builing a new Strawman argument, merely because I chose
434> to restrict a small list of excellent orchestras to North America.

434> Your intellectual dishonesty is noted, Davie.

434> ???

434> Nightingale asked me a question and I answered it.

434> Your statement 'does not follow'.

435> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

435> Kali pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
435> news:d9ic16$8p9$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

435> [...]

435> Right! We commence every meetin' with the readin' o' the rules.

435> Rule Number 1:....

436> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

436> Michael Baldwin Bruce pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
436> scribbled this in news:1119677083.588528.83620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

436> [...]

436> Rule Number 2:

436> No one is to maltreat the Abbos in any way whatsoever -- if there's anybody
436> watching.

436> Rule Number 3:....

436> They shouldn't mistreat the horses that way, either.

437> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

437> Michael Baldwin Bruce pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
437> scribbled this in
437> news:1119707277.440371.278290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

437> Rule Number 4:

437> This term, I do not want to catch anyone not drinking.

437> Rule Number 5:....

437> That method of clue search is not exclusive to these two.

438> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

438> Michael Baldwin Bruce pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
438> scribbled this in news:1119708296.530010.73330
438> @g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

438> Rule Number 6:

438> There is NO...Rule Number 6.

438> Rule Number 7:....

438> No surprise, really.

439> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

439> Michael Baldwin Bruce pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
439> scribbled this in
439> news:1119714049.934258.280580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

439> Right! That concludes the reading of the rules!

439> Way too much information, Bruce!

===========================================================================

Kali writes:

9> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

9> You think? <g> He had me digested before but somehow I fell off
9> the list.

10> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

10> What kind of decent list o' hate doesn't include all of you
10> lovely Bruces?

11> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

11> Yes?

12> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

12> Hey, thanks! I am grateful for my relatively high placement on
12> this fine list!

===========================================================================

"Double-A" writes:

13> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,rec.sport.basketball.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks

13> Wow!

13> Getting original, stating you mind, is that realy you, Bruce?

13> Too bad I couldn't get your video to load, Bruce.

===========================================================================

Pinku-Sensei writes:

16> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,rec.sport.basketball.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy

16> You mean JJayBoyd? He's quite the illucid clueproof foamer, isn't he?

16> Who, me? And of what?

16> <snip!>

16> And Ross has continued to keep the thermostat high in the digests.

16> I've already recommended it to John Henry.

17> Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

17> Glad to read the encourging words, Bruce. Do you think it will get me
17> tenure?

17> Good idea. Let someone else do it. :-)

17> You're welcome! BTW, did you notice that Dr. Tholen snipped his list
17> of AUK awards when he digested our posts?

17> But does he have anything to put in it, Bruce?

18> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,rec.sport.basketball.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy

18> Right, Bruce. Time for another beer.

18> Thanks for reminding me about this, Bruce. Other Bruce, what about
18> Alexa and Bohne?

18> This thread is making me hungry. Know where to get some tucker around
18> here, Bruce?

18> JJayBoyd, the fellow that you thought had potential, once suggested the
18> corpse of her mother be exhumed and slapped for her daughter's sins.
18> Her response "After you."

18> They might be like antimatter, Bruce, theoretically possible, but never
18> seen in real life.

18> Vegetable, Bruce?

18> Yes, Bruce, but he'd never say "He's a fair copper."

18> If he got nice and close to Uranus, that would solve our problems with
18> him.

18> I don't have to imagine it, Bruce. I've seen it.

18> Oh, good, an expert opinion!

18> Well, that might be a long time.

18> ^_^

18> I'm not surprised at his cluelessness. He came out very high on being
18> clueproof when I analyzed his digest.

18> Already brought to the proper people's attention.

18> Right, no organ of affection.

.