Re: Statistical anomalies?
- From: "M. Zaiem Beg" <zbeg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:24:02 -0400
On Wed, 31 May 2006, James Kahn wrote:
:By the convention established in this thread (pct is relative to the
:smaller number), this would be infinity percent.
:
:Reminds me of a newspaper article about the increase in traffic fatalities
:state by state after speed limits went up. Something like (I'm making
:the data up, but the gist of it is accurate):
:
:"Arizona 3 4 +33%
: Utah 5 6 +20%
: Wyoming 0 1 +100%"
:
:Maybe I'm the only one who thought it was funny.
Wyoming population jokes are *always* funny.
--
M. Zaiem Beg zbeg@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Statistical anomalies?
- From: K2
- Re: Statistical anomalies?
- Prev by Date: Jim Leyland: Genius.
- Next by Date: Re: Statistical anomalies?
- Previous by thread: Re: Statistical anomalies?
- Next by thread: Re: Statistical anomalies?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|