Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Realto Margarino <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:17:54 GMT
SavoyBG@xxxxxxx trolled:
> Realto Margarino trolled:
> > But any "metric" that attempts to compare sluggers with
> > speed merchants is quite simply asinine. Any metric that fails to
> > take into account how well the player plays in your park is useless.
> > Any metric that fails to take into account what position in the
> > batting order you are looking to fill is useless.
> Yes, so let's abolish this useless stat called "batting average"
> already.
Nobody ever said that BA was the last word in hitting. BA is only
one jewel of the triple crown.
But I already told you this.
Growing senile in your old age Grossman?
cordially, as always,
rm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: SavoyBG
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- References:
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Perry Sailor
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Josh Rosenbluth
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Realto Margarino
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Josh Rosenbluth
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Realto Margarino
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Josh Rosenbluth
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Realto Margarino
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Josh Rosenbluth
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: Realto Margarino
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- From: SavoyBG
- Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- Prev by Date: Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- Next by Date: Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- Previous by thread: Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- Next by thread: Re: Most all-star selections but not in HOF
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|