Re: Marlins looking to relocate


"Wunnuy" <wunnuy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1132936108.935090.3630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Bill G wrote:
>> <copeab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1132817654.264166.159370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Bill G wrote:
>> > I'm not playing innocent victim, I just failed to realize I was dealing
>> > with
>> someone who takes anything even remotely negative and acts like a
>> cornered
>> animal who's food is about to be taken away. My comment was very mild,
>> far
>> more tame than most supposed "insults" in this or any other ng. Maybe
>> Wunnuy should grow some thicker skin, or quit commenting on things he
>> doesn't know anything about.
>
> You're absolutely playing the innocent victim.

"Gee, all I did was post a link."

Pot kettle black. Sorry those cliches keep fitting you so perfectly.


You're finally admitting
> now that you made an insult here, but according to you, it's okay to
> insult someone for no reason if it's "mild" but getting back like you
> got it is not okay because it wasn't "mild," despite the fact YOU
> started it.

I assumed incorrectly that my mild "insult" was so mild, and also par for
the course in usenet, that you wouldn't explode in such a childish tirade.
I was obviously wrong. Is that your normal method of communication? Then I
imagine you have very few friends in life.


> YOU are the one who needs the thicker skin, my suicidal
> friend. You can dish it out and complain to high heaven but you can't
> take it.

A mild insult results in a nuclear bomb response, and I need thicker skin?


>> As for the "constant blathering", Wunnuy has been ripping into anyone and
>> everyone who doesn't think Pete Rose is one of the all-time greatest
>> hitters
>> ever. And his method is to call them statfans, say they've never been to
>> an
>> actual baseball game, and who's only knowledge of baseball comes from
>> what
>> they read in a box score (along with the perfunctory name-calling).
>>
>
> And please, find one post I've ever done where I've iniated an insult.
> This is what I've been talkinga bout, you and the other six nimrods
> can't have a civil converstation.

None of your conversations are civil. And since you see everything as an
insult, then I have to assume that any response by you would have been to a
post that contained an insult. That justifies (at least to you) your often
totally over the top responses.


> if someone says soemthing you don't
> agree with, you resort to your stupid insults. Yet when it's returned,
> you're absolutely flabbergasted that someone could have insulted you
> and babble on about being insulted for six days.

Apparently you have trouble keeping time (it's barely been 3 days), typical
of the mentally challenged. Being totally enraged at the world all the time
would probably inhibit your ability to work with numbers, which explains
your anger at so-called statfans.


>> Well, that's EXACTLY what he did regarding Portland's viability as an MLB
>> market. He read something in an article, and presented it as something
>> he
>> agreed with both now and at some point in the past. And I'm certain he's
>> never lived in or near Portland, especially since he hasn't countered a
>> single thing I posted regarding that city.
>
> I've never lived in Portland. What does that hav eto do with "your
> blathering about statfans?"

I see your reading comprehension is as non-existent as ever. Or did I just
use to many big words in the previous paragraph?


> That is no different than what
>> he routinely accuses statfans of doing. It's called being a hypocrite,
>> and
>> I called him on it. One could also use the Pot-Kettle-Black comment, but
>> despite it's accuracy, we know Wunnuy will just blow another head gasket
>> and
>> go off on another juvenile rant (which I fully expect anyway).
>
> Use all the stock lines you want. It doesn't bother me a bit

Of course it bothers you. You blew up at Nieporent when he used it
(followed by the usual juvenile name-calling). Maybe if your posts weren't
so hypocritical then you wouldn't get cliched responses.


, it should
> bother you having to resort to a ridiculous lame cliched line all the
> time,

All the time? I did it once, because it so perfectly fits you.


especially when you consider yourself to be so intelligent, but
> it's par for the course, with you're "holy than thou but I can't come
> up with anything intelligent to say so I repeat an oft used cliche as
> much as I can" attitude.

Again, learn to read. I did it once. Of course, I've used it again in this
post, but your responses are so hypocritical, it's hard not to use that
phrase.


> I could probably find a link of cliched lines like that for you so you
> can use more than the same two over and over, but then again, if I post
> a link again, it might the thing that sends you over the edge with your
> suicide.

Aren't you just projecting your own self-hatred onto me when you say I'm
suicidal? I've got no reason to kill myself, and many reasons to continue
living what most people would think is a pretty good life. Maybe if I
didn't have any friends, and could only find someone to go to a baseball
game by desperately pleading on a newsgroup for someone to come to LA, then
I too might be suicidal. But that internal rage you constantly feel
prevents that, and instead results in you lashing out at everyone here, and
is also why you take everything as an insult.

Get over it, and get a life. It's a frickin' newsgroup.


>> If he had "just posted the link", like he now claims, I never would have
>> made the "obviously know nothing" comment.
>
> I thought you said this conversation is over?

And I knew you'd respond to this. I predicted it.


> When the Marlins move to
> Porltand, will you finally finish teh job and slash your wrists? I knwo
> it's killing you.

Blah, blah, blah. More of the same. I bet you cut and paste alot.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: A Google funny.....
    ... I called him `mad' and *later on* after he'd continued to be insulting ... No, actually, if you read back you called him ignorant and mad in the ... I made a very mild comment in response to his insult towards me. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Sexual/sexist insult
    ... [Edith reacts to Mr. Neville's assumptions about her.] ... is a mild by definite form of sexual insult, ... If one man says another is impotent, that is a sexual insult, but to ... overfamiliarity (an affront) that happens to be sexual in nature. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Sexual/sexist insult
    ... [Edith reacts to Mr. Neville's assumptions about her.] ... is a mild by definite form of sexual insult, ... If one man says another is impotent, that is a sexual insult, but to ... overfamiliarity (an affront) that happens to be sexual in nature. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Flamewar _ DO NOT READ
    ... I know that Neo will reply thinking that my responses below are ... I'm just trying to share knowledge that may indicate to Neo ... The issue that is relevant here is that when there is an insult or the ... This is, in fact, a traditional thinking error on both parts. ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.angband)
  • Re: The Maxson Family
    ... responses I would certainly be a better listener and I imagine others would ... You tend to insult people which triggers their anger. ... consider your responses to the issue of Apollo Service ... unanswered issue that you need to address for your accident scenario to go ...
    (sci.space.history)