Re: By the way, Barf and Stoopid



In article <_7-dnQVWddpOA2LanZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bert Hoff <bert.h.hoff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dave Cartman wrote:


Fair enough. If you're around, Bert's jubblies are strictly off limits,
otherwise "go for it." Got it! Thanks!

Dave

Man, you frackin' made my night!

Please do not have any contact with me, publicly or privately.
Please do not respond to my posts, on Usenet or any other Internet
forum. Please stop following me into other Internet forums. Please do
not talk about me on Usenet or other forums. Please stop contacting the
moderators or sysops of any such forums concerning me. Please do not do
any of the aforesaid activities under any other "posting names" you are
currently using, or any new "posting names." Please do not come within
300 years of me.

Hi Bert,

Over the past several days you seem to be getting various RSA posters
confused with each other. I'd be happy to show examples of this, but a
quick review of your posting over the past 7-10 days will make this
apparent.

I believe you intend this post to go to Scott Abraham aka "twobuddha."
Last night, he issued an invitation to physically attack you. I
suggested that he immediately rescind that offer and call you to warn
you that he may have imperiled your safety.

please see this thread:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skiing.alpine/browse_thread/thread/c91
70eef61f185b7/e8bdda8737b4fb20?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=vern93%40gmail.com#e8bdda8
737b4fb20

and this passage:

"Tell you what, Dickless Dave. Why don't you show up and try to kick
him in the nuts yourself?
Might be able to get away with it."

I know that you are a well known internet "troll" and have several
"netkook" awards to your name that are issued by popular vote to usenet
posters whose behavior online is particularly "trollish."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

It appears to be a avid hobby of yours.

Frankly, your request that I ignore your wild accusations in a usenet
forum that you have issued many obvious and demonstrative lies about me
is, well, silly.

If you truly fear for your safety, I suggest that you involve the police
department of your local municipality. Show them the offending posts
and proceed from there. I have no intention or curtailing my usual
internet activities at the demand of a well known, and (literally) award
winning netkook. Particularly regarding a post that sought to clarify
Scott's verbiage to assess it's severity and intent.

Unlike here where can simply cut out parts of the post that don't
support your feigned hysteria, I do think you will find it difficult to
separate my response from Scott's open offer to "kick you in the nuts"
when you involve the police.

You will find it impossible to find a post where I expressed a desire to
see physical harm come to you. I do think you are an unpleasant
character, and have been very clear of my distain for your trollish
behavior and many lies about me as well as falsifying your own
achievements. And I admit, seeing a post by your best friend and ally
inviting the world to LITERALLY kick you in the testicles to be very,
very, very funny.

I the past 10 days you've openly fantasized about how other posters
masturbate, you've become fixated on another's great grandmother's
sexual practices and "gypsys." You've compared me to Ted Bundy and the
Green River Killer while commenting on your fondness for listening to
their monologues and interviews. Now you're asking that I don't come
"within 300 years" of you. Those aren't the sorts of things that a
"reasonable" person says and does.

Neither you nor Scott has made any effort to rescind the open invitation
to kick you in the nuts. If you are truly concerned about your safety,
I would think that is a reasonable first step. Don't you agree?

Dave
.