Re: police

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <rPudnZauYKyq_2fanZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bert Hoff <bert.h.hoff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <cc2d7ad2-9062-4a7c-a6d0-e6840f56ff5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
twobuddha <scottabe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 7, 1:47 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<9896803c-cede-4e5a-837a-ec7c632f4...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,





twobuddha <scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 5, 7:30 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<ae0d3af3-1ae2-4f41-9652-fdaadee96...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
twobuddha <scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 5, 11:54 am, kurtstocklm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
For years police have done crimes. If a lot of people look at my
video the truth might be exposed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV_RaVVGrt8
Kurt Stocklmeir
I understand, Kurt. Detective Leanne Shirey of the Seattle Police
Department suborned perjury and committed perjury in a court hearing.
Shame we don't have video.
What a shame you don't have the balls to try making that charge stick in
a court of law...
SPD covered up. What's new? What is truly laughable is that you
could have tried to make YOUR charges stick, in person, at
Whistler.....you knew exactly where I would be, and when I was there.
No, I didn't. That's why I asked for clarification: to take away your
weasel room and I said as much.
Wrong again, dumb***. You were weaseling yourself, and continue to
weasel. No clarification needed: I was where I said I would be when I
said I would be there, and you have admitted you knew exactly where
that place was.
Nope. I admitted that I *believed* I understood where you'd be, but that I wanted to remove any weasel room.

The Google record confirms this.

As for you being there:

A. You knew I wouldn't be because you failed to meet my condition of clarification.

B. You could have proved that if you'd used the video camera you claimed you were going to have with you.

The clarification didn't come...

No need. You have admitted you knew what I was talking about. No
balls. Coward. Freak. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAH

...until after.
Here is a clue, freak. I do not negotiate with stalkers, freaks, and
nutcases: ie, you.
I challenge you to show up. You didn't. And you keep on making
pathetic excuses for your dickless cowardice.
You had a condition, I met it. I had a condition, you ran.


Yup.

That's about all you've got on this issue, isn't it?


Nope.

You lied when you said it was Scott who said he would bring a vedeo camera.

YOU stated YOU would bring a vedeo camera.


Nope. I'd rather meet at the bottom because I'm really only coming to
call your bluff. I'll be bringing a video camera.

> > Here's a picture of me, although I'll be returning the ski school jacket
> > to Cypress when I go up there on Monday or Tuesday to pick up my gear.

> > <http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/AtPlay-Pages/Image2.html>

> > So, where precisely are you inviting me to meet you?

> You don't know where the information tower is at Whistler? What utter crap.
> What a lying coward!

No, I don't recall. I meant to get up to Whistler this year, but I
didn't. Too many days skiing for free at Cypress.

But since you want to ensure that you can show me up, be specific. Or
are you trying to weasel out of it?

--
Alan Baker

Bert
.