Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- From: "Norm" <Normgrant999@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 17:35:01 GMT
"Jeff Davis" <eagle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
and your "endorsement" of a well known internet kook.
Abraham is a human being.
Well if you want to set the bar that low, OK, that much is probably true.
He's been maligned in rsa because people like
you have published so much unmittigated bullshit about him it necessitated
the creation of rsa.moderated.
No, Scott making a nuisance of himself necessitated the creation of RSAM.
And he's no threat to anyone.
He claims he is.
All this
started when I published the fact that I had met him in person, and found
the crap that gets posted here about him completely untrue.
Any crap at all about Scott which is posted here is in response to Scott
himself. Scott has personally created every issue he faces here and if the
situation is not exactly to his liking (I suspect in fact it is) he has only
himself to blame. If anything which is said about Scott is untrue, all he
has to do is post a link. He doesn't do that. Ever. But everybody who says
anything about Scott has links to back up what they say. Everybody. Always.
Face it Jeff, whatever you thought about him in person, if in fact that
happened, and I'm sceptical, he may not actually be a certified kook, but he
certainly plays one on the internet.
.
- References:
- Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- From: Dave Cartman
- Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- Prev by Date: Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- Next by Date: Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- Previous by thread: Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- Next by thread: Re: An RSA.Mod History Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
