Re: How to kill babies

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:27:11 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Mike from Ottawa" <mev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9d4d149vb8ojvgfvrh5tg5h4j0i6v7q0pa@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:15:45 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>
You're afraid to post your picture here, like most of those that take
cheap shots at the physical appearance of others, but I'd bet a dollar
you're a pitiful, Scrooge looking vulture with a Kennybenny pot and a
cathode ray tan.

Whatever.

Uh-huh.

My, you're such a delicate petal. You're so concerned about looks.
Insecurity AND schizophrenia, all in 1 package.

I'm devilishly handsome, if I say so myself. I carry a baton to keep
back the women; well, some of the women. OK, most of the women, but I
can't say no to Angelina.

I don't ever recall saying I'd attack you. You can't say the same.

I wouldn't say the same.

I rarely regret what I say here, and apologize if I do.

Yes, I've seen you apologise a couple of times. Cudos.

Thank you.

If you ever get me where -I- think I'm wrong, I'll apologize to you wholly
and honestly.

Maybe, and then go back to on the attack. There's that damn
schizophrenia again.

And your threat was low and cowardly, related to my job.

I recall saying that maybe you should be reported to customs,

No, that's not what you said.

Your "recall" is for ***, just like Futile Johns'.

You could easily check what you said, like John could, but then you
couldn't lie about or twist it.

You could easily check it, too, and maybe you have. Bluster is
easier.

after even more of your bragging about your criminal record.

One of the cites that I've requested, that you've previously blown off.

You keep mentioning it, so many times over the years. Which cite
would you like?

<snip>
I also later said I couldn't be
bothered -- minor incidents with the law are ignored at the border.

Cite.

Nah, go look it up yourself. You know it's there.

How about this:

" Dozens of times, including jail time. :-)

My personal best is having been arrested twice for inciting a riot."

Here's the cite: http://tinyurl.com/6lqvtv

Now, your threats were about physical violence. Much more impressive.

Just out of curiosity, is there a difference between a "threat" and a
statement of intention?

Is that supposed to make you sound manly? You don't seem to realise
that it just makes you much, much smaller.

Not related to physical threats you couldn't achieve anyway.

How could you be so sure?

Your cowardice about your picture is more than I need-

As sure as anyone ever was of -anything-.

Ask around.

5 Bucks On Team 3.

Any time you'll state here in writing that you won't charge me with
assault, we can meet for that beer.

Nah, I don't go looking for trouble. Even if we did meet, I wouldn't
take the first swing, but if you take a swing at me you'd get the same
in return. Someone else would call the cops.

It's really amusing to know that we couldn't even sit at a table over
a beer and agree to disagree on things. Use your words, Doug, or go
to your room if you can't act like an adult.

It doesn't matter if you weasel- it'll just be all the more sweet.

It was and is worth an ass-kicking in and of itself.

And what you say isn't?

I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

What you choose to do after that is up to you.

For your gratification, I've said -many- things here worth an ass kicking,
but no one ever seems to get around to it.

Maybe they just considered it just your typical grand-standing. Yawn,
stretch, and blah-blah-blah. You do keep things entertaining, though,
even if you're more of a Jerry Springer type.

I went to -extra ordinary- lengths to arrange a meeting with someone who
mouthed off about me several hundred times here- but -just- before the meet,
he killed himself.

"Extraordinary lengths," hah, you must be joking! This is what really
happened:

"You dared me to meet you on Thursday, I believe. I immediately sent
you my cell #. You said you weren't in town. We were going to try
on Friday. You never called me or sent an e-mail. I'd call that
scurrying, but it's 100% on your part."

You're welcome to go dig that up in the archives, too.

Several people here kept telling me to meet you, that you were a good
guy in-person. Meanwhile, it sounds like you just wanted to pick a
fight. Yup, you're a wonderful guy alright -- maybe they're now
reconsidering their opinions of you.

I had -every- intention of beating him to within an inch of his life if he
had provided the slightest incentive.

And he knew it.

So that was your real intention? What on this earth makes you think
I'd stand still for a thrashing?

<snip>

And no one, especially me, -wants- you to act like me.

Nobody but you could act like you, nor would they want to. Well,
Scott, is an exception.

That's kid talk. Use your words, Doug, or go to your room.

What, are we back to what you don't understand?

I didn't mumble or stutter.

You just fail to comprehend.

Check.

....and mate.

You're too much of a coward to say you hate me, although you spew hate
continually.

I continuosly spew hate against you? You're hallucinating. Try
taking that huge chip off your shoulder.

I'm free and honest with my emotions, and unembarrassed.

You're frequently foul-mouthed and belligerent, too. Glad you're
proud of it.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

I don't have any chip.

Keep waving your arms while you repeat that, over & over.

I post fact.

Right, factoids is more like it.

You refuse to cite, refuse to bet, and even in this post, issue innuendo.

I think you wanted to bet me on whether or not you were really in
Ottawa. Why? I gave you my cell, and I had no way to contact you.
Why should I prove anything? You talked big but you never showed up
or contacted me. This bet crap was just another of your twists to
deflect your own BS.

I'm not the arm-waver.

OK, arm-flapper, if it makes you feel better. Deny, deny, deny and
you might eventually believe it.

<snip>

.