Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Popeye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:29:41 -0500
"JOF" <jofrancis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:b6d72081-b2f1-4292-adbb-906a8d1b78cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 9, 10:59 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Pop...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"ben bradlee" <No...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XO2dnZ653oGUWzDanZ2dnUVZ_rOqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Pop...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote > in
> messagenews:13qrep5a5kni218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "ben bradlee" <No...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:1fSdnQcQh-9HNDDanZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Pop...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>>> in messagenews:13qq0mim1ftge7c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ... in reference to his multiple OT post that includes a blanket
>>>> insult to a bunch of people he doesn't know.
>>> Whooh there Doug. You're a supporter and a proponent of off topic
>>> posting!
>> Absolutely.
> So we agree that you snipe and insult people you don't know even if you
> agree 100% with what the person said and their right to say it. I was
> wrong; I way overstated your potential.
Nice little snippy clippy, just like carl nisrael.
Futile John says this: "Quit clipping the stuff that's damaging to your
argument. Makes it look like it has weaknesses. Mayhap it does?"
But hey, not having Futile John's reading comprehension issues, and being
able to remember what I posted an hour ago, I can work with it.
First, how you got "So we agree that you snipe and insult people you don't
know even if you agree 100% with what the person said and their right to say
it."
From "Whooh there Doug. You're a supporter and a proponent of off topic
posting!" -kennybenny
"Absolutely." <snnnniiippppp> -Popeye
Is a matter for the kennybennybonics translator.
But we -do- agree that we both post off topic whenever we choose.
We -do- agree that you whine and squeal about others posting OT, but still
do more than your fair share.
And we -do- agree that it makes you a hypocrite.
Then, as far as "So we agree that you snipe and insult people you don't
know even if you agree 100% with what the person said and their right to say
it." goes,
It'd be nice if you could cite this somewhere, but we know you can't.
As far as this goes: "So we agree that you snipe and insult people you
don't know", we both agree that you do it while accusing me of it, and that
I know, oh, a hundred times as many (-living-) Rec.scubans as you do.
So we agree that's a hypocrisy twofer.
You been hanging out too close to the Canadian border, dude.
>>> Maybe your insulted because of the dedication to the Me Too gang? Do
>>> you want individual recognition? Isn't a general dedication to the
>>> entire gang good enough? After all, the Me Toos are only effective >>> when
>>> they work together. When they post individually it's almost like they
>>> are thinking for themselves. You just need to remember that being a Me
>>> Too means that you don't think for yourself.
>> "I just wonder why you post such demeaning garbage. I've
>> said it before so it should come as no surprise that your snipes and
>> insults
>> toward people you don't know do more harm to you than anybody else."
> Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I'm finally beginning to
> understand what you guys mean by "hero worship."
It's nice that you think you understand -something- here.
But I just hold the light.
Ironic post from one who describes everyone else as whiney.
Sure have a strange definition of "whiney".
Did you have some counterpoint to my factual, cited accuracy?
Some insight to the kennybennybonics above?
Or just the usual baseless smear attempt?
At least it's good for you to maintain a standard.
--
"To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
~Jeff Snyder~
.
- References:
- Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: ben bradlee
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: Joe English
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: Scott
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: JOF
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: ben bradlee
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: ben bradlee
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: ben bradlee
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick
- Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- From: JOF
- Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- Prev by Date: Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- Next by Date: Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- Previous by thread: Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- Next by thread: Re: Management Lessons 5 - Dedicated to the Me Too gang
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|