Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:54:40 -0600
<janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187072490.412967.38880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 14 Sie, 08:24, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:your
<janus...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187068436.998862.267170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 14 Sie, 03:02, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Joe English" <joeengli...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46c0fe2e$0$11794$ec3e2dad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That speaks worlds of your expertise - you have really validated
Pelosiperception. thanks god, it is a picture taken from far away..
isDennis, unfortunately you are not as smart as you think, so I'll
about a 6 Iron - she looks great from 150 yards away
meansYeah, but she doesn't have a moustache or beard, and for jAnus, that
she is a 10.
No, my dumb friend. She is 67.
So that would be 67 on a scale from 1 to n, n being......?
Clearly, Scott was referring to a numeric rating from 1-10.
Surely you realized that?
explain it to you.
Joe said that she looks good from 150 yards away, as it is the
distance for 6 iron golf club - it was quite funny. Then Scotty comes
with a number - 10. Surely he didn't understand Joe's joke. There is
Clearly, he did, because he said that since she doesnt hafve a moustache or
beard, for you she'd be a 10.
This is a reflection of what he believes would be your low standards.
no 10 iron, and what is important the bigger number the shorter
distance. If you claim that he was referring to the scale 1 to 10 it's
possible, but unfortunately oligophrenic ways of "thinking" are
completely unknown to me.
Janusz, its become obvious to me that ANY way of "thinking" is completely
unknown to you.
If you are really interested what the number 67 means - it's her age
and for this age IMHO she looks quite good.
And thus proving Scott's point.
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- References:
- OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Scott
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Grumman-581
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Grumman-581
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Chris Guynn
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Joe English
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Scott
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- OT; Now here is some good news!
- Prev by Date: Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- Next by Date: Re: Attacking shark instead of running from it to survive?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- Next by thread: Re: OT; Now here is some good news!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|