Re: Dive tables

"Mike from Ottawa" wrote in message news:nvb0a3tg4llnq2v7sn41t010ohvd6c9bnm@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:56:15 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Mike from Ottawa" wrote in message
<snip>
But you can continue to comfort yourself in "wobbly pops" and delusion if
you wish- I've met over 100 people here, you've met none that I know of.

Nope, I haven't met anyone from RS -- I really don't spend much time
in this ng, I rarely go down to the US, and most of my friends are
real, not virtual.

Here's a hint:

After you meet friends from the internet (like, over 100 of them), they're real, not virtual.

Especially when there's repeated dive trips and home visits, some for over a ten year period.

Dip***.

But I'm giving an open invitation to anyone who
makes it to this part of the world, or wants to arrange for some
diving on the St Lawrence.

<snip>
And exactly how would you do that? Got the FBI on the case?

More delusions.

Actually, Edmonton Rec.scubans who think you're a total *** (most of
the Canadians do)
are having friends in RCMP verify your name and phone number, a simple task.

But they think you're a great guy, right? <guffaw>

Ask around.

It's pretty funny that Rec.scubans that live an hour or two from you, or occasionally work in your area, don't even bother to arrange to meet for a beer.

John Francis (and 10 others) have been to my house.

Curtis has had his family to my house.

Even if this absurdity was true, why would there be any need and why
are you so cautious?

Actually, you in particular attempted to (lamely) threaten my job.

But carl is in an ongoing process- he's already tried to involve other Rec.scubans.

He wants to find out what company I work for so he can report me to the border patrol or customs.

Like you specifically stated you would.

I really haven't concealed very much, although
I won't provide a home tel. # or address, just to protect my own
family.

They gleefully offered to do it.

Hah, that's rich. <snicker>

It sure was.

I'll call Friday.

Sure. You said you'd call today and you'd be here but you really
disappointed me. Ya gotta get those stories straight.

I called your bluff and you fumbled the ball.

You're back pedaling now, though, as fast as you can.

How can I meet you for lunch "downtown" with a tractor-trailer?

Besides, I won't deliver to Orleans till early afternoon.

But I'll be back, and then we'll see.

Maybe we can get John to meet us to protect you.

I've said before I never wanted to meet you or your Yesman Scotty but
I was too gracious last night;

There's a rarity.

must've been the beer talking.

And I'm sure that's a regular problem for you after one or two.

Being gracious? Not a problem for me at all. You, however, sound
pretty nasty when you're supposedly sober. I bet you're a mean drunk.

More of your quality perception.

Many people here have been drunk with me, and none have reported me to be mean.

So far your perceptions bat about zero.

But, hey, I'll live up to it. If you really come here and you really
call,
we'll go for a beer. I won't be holding my breath.

You're the one that needs to get your story straight.

Whatever. You're starting to bore me again.

BTW, I'm available for lunch, but not dinner -- my lady and I are
going out Friday night. I'll probably be in meetings during the
morning, but leave a message and I'll get back to you. If you can't
make it for lunch downtown, well, too bad; you said you'd be here 2
days ago.

Fair enough, you out-foxed me to chicken*** out of a meet, fair and square.

But I'll be back.





--

"I wasn't going to get into any of this until later, but you asked
a reasonable question. The problem for me in answering is that
I'm theorizing with more intuited logic than facts." -JOF

Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

.

Loading