Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Greg Mossman <mossman@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 May 2007 17:13:14 -0700
On May 15, 4:55 pm, Joe English <joeengli...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's completely incompatible with any system of private ownership of
property. Anything that you claim to be yours infringes on my rights
to it.
When I traveled to Yap, the hotel warned us to keep anything remotely
valuable or even pretty to look locked up in the safe, not because
their housekeeping staff were dishonest, but because the Yapese don't
have a well-defined system of private ownership and don't understand
that it's not OK to "borrow" a guest's possessions without
permission. On the brighter side, they also don't understand why
women would wear tops.
you'd be wrong, again-
Huh? About what? Or is this another of your intentional mistypings?
Sometimes I think you're on a different thread than the rest of us,
Joe English.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Joe English
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- References:
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Mike from Ottawa
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Mike from Ottawa
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: -hh
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Mike from Ottawa
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Mike from Ottawa
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: -hh
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Mike from Ottawa
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Chris Guynn
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Greg Mossman
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- From: Joe English
- Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof of the pudding . . .
- Next by Date: Re: Proof of the pudding . . .
- Previous by thread: Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- Next by thread: Re: Quick, check Snopes.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|