Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:45:41 -0600
<janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135262705.315558.158070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
> > <janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1135253023.936247.177160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Popeye wrote:
> > > > <janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:1135244135.839213.9470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > <snip>
> > >
> > > Your choice, Comrade.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > You're the only former Communist here.
> > >
> > > To be former it is necessary to be one before. I don't recall to be
one
> > > myself.
> >
> > So the brainwashing was really effective then?
>
>
> I don't know. Never subject to such a process. Could do enlighten me?
Nope.
> I've heard that your country has some big achievement in the field.
> Even torture is legal, now.
>
>
> >
> > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > Second time. - Why did they kick you out?
> > > >
> > > > Second time- No question.
> > >
> > > Third time - Afraid to answer?
> >
> > If a question is based on a fulty premise, does it deserve an answer?
>
> ????
Ok, I'm typing slowly for you.
you asked "when did they kick you out".
the premise being that he was kicked out.
If that was not the case, then the question is based on a faulty premise.
A classic example is
"when did you stop beating your wife"
Its premise is twofold
a) that the person being queried is married
b) that the person being queried was, at one time, beating his wife.
> > <snip>
> > Dennis
>
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- References:
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: JOF
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: JOF
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Scott
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: JOF
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Scott
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Popeye
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- From: janusz_w@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- Prev by Date: Re: Early Merry Xmas
- Next by Date: Interesting video (Scuba related... sort of)
- Previous by thread: Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- Next by thread: Re: The John and Doug Gun Debate Thread.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|