Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:39:28 -0600
"Michael Wolf" <michael.wolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:438ac2ef$0$3203$ba620e4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
> > "Michael Wolf" <michael.wolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:4385750a$0$10952$ba620e4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
<snip>
> >
> >
> > Just want to be clear, since you havent come up with a good definition.
>
> As I said already a couple of times: it' snot up tom eto come with a
> good definition. It's a job for the lawmakers.
Lets see, so you can't come up with a good definition, and evidently can't
come up with more examples, but hey, you're absolutely sure this is
absolutely needed and will make the world a better place.
:-)
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>>How will you know that this has happened? By snooping around?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Thats why I'm asking.
> >>
> >>I didn't see a question mark in your sentence "Three folks getting
> >>together in a house can result in "hate speech" being uttered."
> >
> >
> > Thats why I'm asking for examples of "hate speech", Michael. :-)
> > I mean, if you're not going to give examples, i have to come up with my
own.
> > Ones that'll demonstrate the ineffectiveness of these "laws"
>
> Depends on how the lawmakers define them.
>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > "hate speech" laws?
>
>
> some, yes
Then, it would seem sensible that you would just post the definition from
that country (or countries) laws with which you most closely agree.
But that'd be the easy way out.
>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>Thats your question, Michael
> >>
> >>So, what's your answer?
> >
> >
> > Not relevant. :-)
>
> Your answers aren't relevant?
My intention is not relevant, or shou;dn;'t be, since I could say whatevwer
I liked, and you'd have a difficult time verifying it.
>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>
> >>>Again, provide examples.
> >>>You mentioned some broadcaster from Rwanda. How would your "hate
speech"
> >>>laws affect that?
> >>
> >>they would be forced to stop.
> >
> >
> > By who?
>
> By law representatives.
In your exmaple of Rwanda, he was doing what the "law representatives"
wanted, IIRC.
So why would they stop him?
<snip>
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- References:
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: janusz_w
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- From: Michael Wolf
- Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- Prev by Date: For Don - Crime in the North
- Next by Date: Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- Previous by thread: Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- Next by thread: Re: Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading