Re: liberal press

BarryNL wrote:

Scott wrote:

"BarryNL" <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43180b4c$0$11070$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Erm, a strange way to view people who are prepared to fight and die for
their beliefs.




Oh, you mean like Americans?


I can think of many things to call terrorists but cowards
isn't one of them.



Of course not, since you carry their banner proudly.


Yeah sure. "If you're not with us you're with the terrorists", huh? The battle cry of the simple minded everywhere.

Unfortunately, the real political world is a lot more complex than your blind jingoism allows you to see. It's a shame because if more people would appreciate it then the war on terrorism might actually stand a chance instead of increasing the terrorism potential.

SO where is the nuance? Either you support Al Queda, or you don't.

Please explain the options here.



--

Rest assured: I am up to something

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: liberal press
    ... their beliefs. ... Yeah sure. ... It's a shame because if more people would appreciate it then the war on terrorism might actually stand a chance instead of increasing the terrorism potential. ...
    (rec.scuba)
  • Re: PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
    ... >> Huh? ... Assuming that you're referring to either uk.current-events. ... >> terrorism or uk.current-events.tsunami, ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.net.news.config)
  • Re: [Fwd: Removal Notification]
    ... Huh? ... >This qualifies as terrorism ... nasty emails, they kill people. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: [Fwd: Removal Notification]
    ... Huh? ... >This qualifies as terrorism ... nasty emails, they kill people. ...
    (sci.nonlinear)
  • Re: [Fwd: Removal Notification]
    ... Huh? ... >This qualifies as terrorism ... nasty emails, they kill people. ...
    (sci.fractals)