Complete DEBUNKING of hh's (Hugh Huntinger) Name Smearing Tactics

-hh (Hugh Huntzinger) wrote:
> Troll Bob Ling Reef Fish wrote:
> > ... [snip drivel]...

Anyone who has read this (or other newsgroups in which I post, for
more than a few weeks, would have KNOWN that the one-and-only
Reef Fish in the posting history kept by google since 1981 is
THIS Bob Ling, and not the THOUSANDS of other Bob Lings when
you do a Google web search for "Bob Ling".

Hugh, you're one of a dying breed of brain-dead posters who are
still trying to use Bob Ling every time in your attempt to smear
my profession and what most people know me by that name in my
profession (statistics).

You went so far as to digging up a 10-year-old student newspaper
article thinking it would SMEAR me in my profession, when you
couldn't find anything in the google archives of my 100,000 posts.

Below is the relevant excerpt:

This was in 2004, NEARLY TEN YEARS after the news article appeared and
FOUR YEARS after I retired!

============= begin excerpt of April 2005 post on
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again"

Hugh certainly went a Loooooonnnnnng way to try to dig up what he
thought was DIRT to smear Reef Fish Bob in his profession.

hh> http://hubcap.clemson.edu/Tige­r/news/art01ns,99,01,15.html

RF> Glad you found it. What has THAT got to do with my SCUBA
postings?

RF> That article was written by a student in the weekly Newspaper
RF> back in the late 1990s. The writer chose to interview me
RF> because I was the most vocal of all professors against such
RF> "student abuse" and I could speak out without any fear of
RF> any of the administrators.
RF>
RF> The report was an ACCURATE, FAIR, and INFORMATIVE one!!!!
RF>
RF> Hugh, your unethical and gratuitous act of digging up something
RF> you THOUGHT was dirt that would embarrasse me (in view of your
RF> self-admitted GRUDGE against me) in a matter that is entirely
RF> irrelevant to my rec.scuba postings, turned out to be my BEST
RF> REBUTTAL -- which I knew was there, but didn't bother to give
RF> details because they were as inappropriate as Hugh and Forest
RF> bring it up in the first place.

In that article, I had EVIDENCE that the "student ratings" was rigged
in my case, because the person who ran the webpage was caught by me
when he THREW OUT an anon-submitted rating (by one of my students)
that was very favorable about my teaching. The FACT was stated in
the newspaper article, and when student who was caught red handed
had "no comment" according to the article.

RF> Thanks Hugh, for shooting your own foot, and EXPOSED yourself
RF> once more, for being a SUPREME HYPOCRITE.

============== end excerpt of April 2005 post on
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again"


The only OTHER Reef Fish in the history of ng posting is
Reef Fish (Nasty_Nassau_Grouper@xxxxxxxxx) forged several times
by some mentally deranged, quite possibly even by YOU, because of
your experience in posting with sockpuppets.

If you want to try to smear me in my profession, go to sci.stat.math
which is SUPPOSED to be a group for professional statisticians.
But it turned out that there are more statistical QUACKS and mal-
practioners than there are scuba-idiots in rec.scuba.

The BIGGEST of the quacks in sci.stat.math, a Ph.D. statistician
says he, was so thoroughly exposed by me that he started looking
for DIRT on the internet on me, and when he found hh and Ron Lee
who kept calling me "Bob Ling" when I am the "Reef Fish", he
thought he must have found some hidden dirt he didn't understand,
but kept using it. Then a SECOND moron copied his stupidity.

Here's the post in that group, applicable to Hugh's stupidity
as well:

http://tinyurl.com/b7sob

Here's another post to that clueless Abe about his cluelessness
about THIS Bob (Abe already knew by then that I had a national
reputation in statistics, and thought I was a former President
of the American Statistical Association, named Bob, and the
author of a very well-known textbook in statistics:

http://tinyurl.com/cseha


And FINALLY, here's an endorsement from a statistics group, by a
statistician about my STATISTICAL credential, which was flamed
in several newsgroups (rec.scuba.*, rec.games.bridge, and even
sci.stat.math) until then. The NOISE there quieted down and
remained silent throughout the past few months. The post was
especially SIGNIFICANT because it was posted by someone in that
group who USED to flame me because he didn't know better, and
had been drawn into the feeding frenzy of the OTHER Mental
Midgets and Quacks in that sci.stat.math group, not only TAUGHT
ME (unbeknownst to him) HOW to search for my (professional name)
self, but had this to say,

http://tinyurl.com/brs7h

*> It turns out that if
*> the Reef Fish's presumed name is entered into Google between
*> quotes and with his middle initial, Google returns "about 159"
*> results, about 70 of which are displayed before "In order to
*> show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries
*> very similar to the 70 already displayed" ALL of which are
*> about that one person and show that person's statistical
*> credentials to be beyond reproach.

Among those webpage hits for "Robert F. Ling", you also find a
couple of TRASH posts by Hugh Huntzinger in DeeperBlue.net Forum.


> Troll Bob Ling Reef Fish wrote:

Hypocrite "permanent grudge holder Hugh Huntzinger", don't you
think it's about time you give up the misguided Ron Lee tactics
of thinking the use of "Bob Ling" is a way to smear me and my
profession?

Besides, in your idiotic use of "Bob Ling Reef Fish wrote",
do you know any OTHER Reef Fish (other than the three forged
posts that might have been forged by you) in the history of
USENET since 1981?

Hugh, it's time to wake up from your stupor in your Army
Barracks. You're giving even the oxymoron "military intelligence"
a bad name!


The only item of SCUBA substance in hh's post was:

> Of course, since Greg did make it clear that he didn't have any grief
> getting to Grand Cayman (where the Aggressor leaves from), this did
> already infer that the option of the liveaboard had been already
> considered and rejected by Greg.

Hugh, in your zest to smear, you forgot to read Greg's LATEST post,
relative to Lee Bell's error, which at the same time implied that
your present statement is, as your usual self, full of ***!

GM> "I have been thinking about a Cayman Aggressor trip someday to
GM> alleviate the weight limitations, but with my luck we'd never
GM> make it off Grand Cayman."

GM> I prefer liveaboards over land-based dive resorts because it's
GM> even easier-going than land-based diving and surface intervals
GM> are spent on a large yacht instead of on a rocking canoe. You
GM> get to meet people, fellow divers tend to be more experienced,
GM> and, at least on Aggressors, the booze is included.

Did that sound like someone who "already considered and rejected"
the Cayman Aggressor, Hugh?

> -hh

Since I've been cross-posted gang-flamed in 11 newsgroups, one
of which is rec.games.bridge, it is only fitting that "hh" is a
very well known bridge character, "Hidious Hog", made famous by
the bridge writer Victor Mollo.

Hugh, you are HIDIOUS indeed.

-- Bob.

.