Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'

On 2006-09-14, runsrealfast <tay01020@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/trackandfield/news/story?id=2581927

ok I know that this topic has already been discussed but I was looking
around espn today and found this one. Even though its a couple of days
old I had not read it yet. Apparently, in pounds eyes there is no such
thing as a false positive. I thought the whole reason behind the B
sample was to prevent those and protect the athlete. Now when that

No, the purpose is to ensure a fair and effective testing process. If Pound's
only failure was failing to "protect" athletes, that would be fine with me.
He is not obliged to protect anything except the integrity of the sport.

happens Pound questions it. I wonder if its time to replace Pound and
get someone thats not against the athletes with someone that would be
fair.

Jones is so suspicious that everyone who's been paying attention believes
she's at least very likely to be a doper.

But Pound is just way out of line here. Ultimately, those comments undermine
the testing process that he is supposed to be presiding over.

Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/
.

Quantcast