Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- From: "Charlie Pendejo" <Charlie.Pendejo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Sep 2006 15:29:28 -0700
runsrealfast wrote:
I wonder if its time to replace Pound and get someone thats
not against the athletes with someone that would be fair.
Does it also bother you when prosecuting attorneys are "against the
defendents" rather than "fair"?
The two-sample process allows Jones to run another day, regardless of
what Pound thinks or says. How much further backwards do you propose
we should bend to be "fair" to someone who, in this particular case,
almost certainly has a long history as a drug cheat, at the expense of
clean athletes who after years of brutally hard work and dedication are
robbed of medals, winnings, and endorsements?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- From: runsrealfast
- Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- From: Mark Hutchinson
- Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- References:
- WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- From: runsrealfast
- WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- Prev by Date: Re: npr
- Next by Date: Re: Running for weight loss?
- Previous by thread: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- Next by thread: Re: WADA's Pound: Jones' inconsistent tests 'disturbing'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|