Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Sep 2006 16:46:44 -0700
News User wrote:
Dominic Shields wrote:
According to our scale it's 28-30%, 48% Water. That means out of my 250Says who? I'm 6"2' and very broad shoulders (think football player
build). Right now I'm 245 and at 190 I'd look like an anorexic. I'm
shooting for 200-220.
Have your body fat percentage measured, then you'll know for sure.
lbs, 120 lbs is water, 75 lbs is fat leaving 55 lbs for muscle, organs,
and bones. Something's off there, but close enough for me.
Still don't think 190 is going to look right on me.
So your lean mass is 175. If you could keep that lean mass and cut down
to 190 pounds, you would not look anorexic. You'd be as muscular as you
are now, and quite ripped at 7% BF.
.
- References:
- Running for weight loss?
- From: ih4553
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: John B.
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: Craig Pennington
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: News User
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: Dominic Shields
- Re: Running for weight loss?
- From: News User
- Running for weight loss?
- Prev by Date: Re: Running for weight loss?
- Next by Date: Re: Running for weight loss?
- Previous by thread: Re: Running for weight loss?
- Next by thread: Re: Running for weight loss?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|