Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: "Justis" <justtis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 15:48:32 -0500
RE: Par Electronics EF-SWL
"Cheaper just to roll your own transformer and hook up a wire to it."
I have a 9::1 balun.
This coax cable they describe, would any other cable say RG8/RG6 do the same
job? Live close to heavy industry and the noise at times just blankets the
area. NEED a quiet antenna. Thanks for the help!
R71A, NRD-535, NRD-525, E1 Main receivers.
"dxAce" <dxAce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4F2CFC14.AF991947@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Justis wrote:
Found!
http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/sw_ant/2205.html
Par Electronics EF-SWL
Do you or some of the others have any input on this antenna? Seems a
bit
too good to be true but great if it works.
Cheaper just to roll your own transformer and hook up a wire to it.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: RHF
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: Brenda Ann
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- References:
- Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: Steve
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: Justis
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: Justis
- Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- From: dxAce
- Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- Prev by Date: Re: EiBi Skeds Updated
- Next by Date: Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- Previous by thread: Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- Next by thread: Re: Wellbrook loop vs Pixel Technology's RF Pro-1A
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
