Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
- From: dxAce <dxAce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:49:58 -0500
David wrote:
dxAce wrote:
David wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
Why? Because it is not yet necessary.
We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994.
The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an
acceptable deviation.
Obviously.
.
- References:
- Why no Leap Second lately?
- From: David
- Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
- From: dxAce
- Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
- From: David
- Why no Leap Second lately?
- Prev by Date: Re: ? WHY Use RG6 Quad-Shield Coax Cable over RG8 and RG58 Coax Cables for Shortwave Radio Listening (SWL) Antenna Feed-in-Lines ?
- Next by Date: Re: What Does "RG-6" {Coax Cable} Mean ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
- Next by thread: Ham Radio Outlet sells the good stuff by the foot (re: RG6 vs RG8X)
- Index(es):
