Re: Why no Leap Second lately?

From: David <nothere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:47:12 -0800

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second

Why? Because it is not yet necessary.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994. The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an acceptable deviation.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
  - From: dxAce

References:
- Why no Leap Second lately?
  - From: David
- Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
  - From: dxAce

Prev by Date: Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
Next by Date: Re: ? WHY Use RG6 Quad-Shield Coax Cable over RG8 and RG58 Coax Cables for Shortwave Radio Listening (SWL) Antenna Feed-in-Lines ?
Previous by thread: Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
Next by thread: Re: Why no Leap Second lately?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread