Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: "David Eduardo" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:56:33 -0700
"IBOCcrock" <ibocisacrock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188862391.341902.29080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 3, 3:55?pm, "David Eduardo" <da...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"IBOCcrock" <ibocisacr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188847814.112002.185860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The digital signals are only 1% of the analog - IBOC's coverage isn't
even 50% that of analogs !
Digital has totally different properties than analog. I have seen plenty
of
data showing the HD signal, on a 3rd generation receiver, is robust
beyond
the "usable" signal range of analog AM or FM, which is the 10 mv/m AM
curve
and the 64 dbu FM contour.
"A Station Owner's View of HD Radio Industry"
"We were told back in the beginning that the HD coverage would be
equal to the analog signal. Unfortunately, the industry is now finding
out this is not the case, that the HD coverage is considerably less,
something like 60% of the analog coverage.
The HD signal is good in the same contours where about 96% to 97% of all AM
and FM listening occur... in fact, it is good beyond those contours.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: K Isham
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- References:
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Telamon
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Telamon
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Doodler
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Steve
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: IBOCcrock
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: IBOCcrock
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: IBOCcrock
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Prev by Date: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Next by Date: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Previous by thread: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Next by thread: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|