Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: dxAce <dxAce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:08:06 -0400
David "Damn, I'm running out of ways to convince these folks that failed
technology will really work", wrote:
"Steve" <renopithicus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1188848796.536508.212430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 3, 3:28 pm, "David Eduardo" <da...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"dxAce" <dx...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46DC5FCC.CF968385@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David "I am truly bat *** crazy to keep on trying convince people that
I'm
really 'Eduardo'", wrote:
"dxAce" <dx...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46DC5C4F.EFA75506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Already took a whole bunch of classes. Ya see Edweenie, I actually
have
a
college degree. And, I'm not unemployed, I'm retired.
A retired person is not employed. So you are unemployed.
No, I'm retired, 'tard boy.
As I said, a retired person (And I said "retired" and not "retarded"
which
may be my error) does not work. That means such a person is unemployed.-
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No it doesn't. A person can retire from one occupation and still be
actively engaged in another.
The only thing dxAss is actively engaged in is the dispensation of vitriol;
he never adds to a discussion but, instead, insults the participants. The
guy is devoid of thoughts and full of bile and invective.
Awww... poor little mentally ill, bat *** crazy, fake Hispanic.
Cry me a rio!!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- References:
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Doodler
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Steve
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: IBOCcrock
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: dxAce
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: dxAce
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: dxAce
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: dxAce
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: Steve
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Prev by Date: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Next by Date: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Previous by thread: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Next by thread: Re: Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
- Index(es):